Literature DB >> 21820465

Breast cancer screening for women ages 50 to 69 years a systematic review of observational evidence.

Russell Harris1, John Yeatts, Linda Kinsinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the observational evidence concerning the effect of screening on breast cancer mortality in actual populations of women ages 50-69 years.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and multiple reference lists for relevant cohort and ecologic studies. At least 2 authors reviewed abstracts and full texts of studies meeting eligibility criteria. We rated each accepted study on standard quality criteria and developed a Summary Evidence Table.
RESULTS: Seventeen studies met eligibility criteria. Five studies found no to small effect of screening (0-12% relative risk reduction [RRR] in breast cancer mortality), 4 found a large effect (greater than 33% RRR), and 8 found a moderate effect (13% to 33% reduction). The authors found concerns about quality in all studies. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the effectiveness of screening is decreasing over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Current observational evidence shows that breast cancer screening in actual populations of women ages 50 to 69 reduces breast cancer mortality; the magnitude of the effect is probably smaller than predicted in the randomized controlled trials. Because the magnitude may change (either increase or decrease) in the future, further ecologic studies are needed. The methodology and infrastructure for these studies should be improved.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21820465     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  12 in total

1.  Screening: Don't look now.

Authors:  Emily Sohn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Multi-centre analysis of incidental findings on low-resolution CT attenuation correction images.

Authors:  J Coward; R Lawson; T Kane; M Elias; A Howes; J Birchall; P Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Breast cancer screening: the questions answered.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Laura J Esserman; Chris I Flowers; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Jamie L Carter; Russell J Coletti; Russell P Harris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-07

7.  Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in population screening: does it make breast screening worthless?

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.248

Review 8.  Four Principles to Consider Before Advising Women on Screening Mammography.

Authors:  John D Keen; Karsten J Jørgensen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Screening mammography & breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of quasi-experimental studies.

Authors:  Veronica L Irvin; Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of organised mammography screening on stage-specific incidence in Norway: population study.

Authors:  Mette L Lousdal; Ivar S Kristiansen; Bjørn Møller; Henrik Støvring
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.