Literature DB >> 21817940

Midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to determine the exact position of the cochlear implant electrode array.

Patrick Lecerf1, David Bakhos, Jean-Philippe Cottier, Emmanuel Lescanne, Jean Paul Trijolet, Alain Robier.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: A midmodiolar reconstruction with multislice computed tomography could potentially be used clinically to determine the cochlear implant electrode array position if the technique was validated with a cadaveric temporal bone study.
BACKGROUND: Several radiologic studies using sophisticated techniques have been described. This study was designed to validate a standard multislice computed tomography scan technique to determine the electrode array position.
METHODS: This ex vivo study was conducted on 18 cadaveric temporal bones without malformation. Cochlear electrode dummies were implanted by a single experimented surgeon with the Advance Off-Stylet technique. After randomization, the placement was processed through an anteroinferior or superior cochleostomy for respective scala tympani or vestibuli positioning with direct location of the basilar membrane. Cadaveric temporal bones were then scanned (Philips Brilliance 40 computed tomographic scan) and reconstructed into the midmodiolar computed tomography scan plane (± 45 degrees, z-axis in the cochlear coordinate system). Two independent neuroradiologists, who were unaware of the implanted scala, evaluated the electrode array position on a computed tomographic scan through the midmodiolar reconstruction. In the end, the microanatomic study was the criterion standard to determine the exact scala localization of the electrode array.
RESULTS: Nine electrodes were inserted into the scala tympani, and 9 were inserted into the scala vestibuli. According to our anatomic criterion standard, the midmodiolar reconstruction sensitivity and the specificity for the scala tympani position were 0.875 (range, 0.722-1.0) and 1.0, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity for dislocation and the scala vestibuli position were both 1.0. The radioanatomic concordance was 0.94 (range, 0.89-0.98) for determining the electrode array position into scalae with midmodiolar reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: Our cadaveric study validates midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to routinely determine the precise position of the cochlear implant electrode array. This study opens the field for further clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21817940     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318229d4dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  [Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography].

Authors:  C Güldner; R Weiss; B Eivazi; S Bien; J A Werner; I Diogo
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Standardization of CT depiction of cochlear implant insertion depth.

Authors:  C C Colby; N W Todd; H R Harnsberger; P A Hudgins
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Frank Risi; Bernard Escudé; Irfan Durmo; Christopher James; Frédéric Lauwers; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Visualization, measurement and modelling of the cochlea using rotating midmodiolar slice planes.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Daniel Schurzig; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Micro-CT scan, electron microscopy and optical microscopy study of insertional traumas of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexia Le Breton; Franck Jegoux; Paul Pilet; Benoit Godey
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  On the accuracy of cochlear duct length measurement in computed tomographic images.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Marcel Kluge; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Possibility of differentiation of cochlear electrodes in radiological measurements of the intracochlear and chorda-facial angle position.

Authors:  I Diogo; U Walliczeck; J Taube; N Franke; A Teymoortash; J Werner; C Güldner
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  3D curved multiplanar cone beam CT reconstruction for intracochlear position assessment of straight electrodes array. A temporal bone and clinical study.

Authors:  D De Seta; P Mancini; F Y Russo; R Torres; I Mosnier; J L Bensimon; E De Seta; D Heymann; O Sterkers; D Bernardeschi; Y Nguyen
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.124

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.