Literature DB >> 28547663

Pediatric Predispositional Genetic Risk Communication: Potential Utility for Prevention and Control of Melanoma Risk as an Exemplar.

Yelena P Wu1,2, Darren Mays3, Wendy Kohlmann4, Kenneth P Tercyak3.   

Abstract

Predispositional genetic testing among minor children is intensely debated due to the potential benefits and harms of providing this type of genetic information to children and their families. Existing guidelines on pediatric genetic testing state that predispositional testing could be appropriate for minors if preventive services exist that mitigate children's risk for or severity of the health condition in question. We use the example of hereditary melanoma to illustrate the rationale for and potential application of genetic risk communication for an adult-onset cancer to a pediatric population where childhood behaviors may reduce risk of disease later in life. We draw from the adult melanoma genetic risk communication and pediatric health behavior change literatures to suggest ways in which genetic test reporting and complementary education could be delivered to children who carry a hereditary risk for melanoma and their families in order to foster children's engagement in melanoma preventive behaviors. Genetic discoveries will continue to yield new opportunities to provide predispositional genetic risk information to unaffected individuals, including children, and could be delivered within programs that provide personalized and translational approaches to cancer prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer prevention; Melanoma; Pediatric; Predispositional genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28547663      PMCID: PMC5702278          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0105-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  69 in total

1.  Sun protection policies and practices in New Zealand primary schools.

Authors:  Anthony I Reeder; Janet A Jopson; Andrew Gray
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2012-02-10

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors.

Authors:  Sara Gandini; Francesco Sera; Maria Sofia Cattaruzza; Paolo Pasquini; Roberto Zanetti; Cinzia Masini; Peter Boyle; Carmelo Francesco Melchi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Sun protection practices among children with a family history of melanoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Roshan Bastani; L Cindy Chang; Rachna Khanna; Katherine Chen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors?

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Laura M Koehly; Saskia C Sanderson; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors for individuals at elevated risk.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Bridgid M Conn; Tammy Stump; Bridget Grahmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Geographical variation in the penetrance of CDKN2A mutations for melanoma.

Authors:  D Timothy Bishop; Florence Demenais; Alisa M Goldstein; Wilma Bergman; Julia Newton Bishop; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Agnès Chompret; Paola Ghiorzo; Nelleke Gruis; Johan Hansson; Mark Harland; Nicholas Hayward; Elizabeth A Holland; Graham J Mann; Michela Mantelli; Derek Nancarrow; Anton Platz; Margaret A Tucker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Long-term ultraviolet flux, other potential risk factors, and skin cancer risk: a cohort study.

Authors:  Shaowei Wu; Jiali Han; Francine Laden; Abrar A Qureshi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Laurence B McCullough; Leslie G Biesecker; Steven Joffe; Lainie Friedman Ross; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Sunburns and risk of cutaneous melanoma: does age matter? A comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leslie K Dennis; Marta J Vanbeek; Laura E Beane Freeman; Brian J Smith; Deborah V Dawson; Julie A Coughlin
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 10.  The genetic basis of familial adenomatous polyposis and its implications for clinical practice and risk management.

Authors:  Maria Liz Leoz; Sabela Carballal; Leticia Moreira; Teresa Ocaña; Francesc Balaguer
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2015-04-16
View more
  3 in total

1.  Parent and child perspectives on perceived barriers to child sun protection and their association with sun protection strategies among children of melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Bridget G Parsons; Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth M Boucher; Heloisa Caputo; Ryan Mooney; Douglas Grossman; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  A novel educational intervention targeting melanoma risk and prevention knowledge among children with a familial risk for melanoma.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Elizabeth Nagelhout; Lisa G Aspinwall; Kenneth M Boucher; Bridget G Parsons; Wendy Kohlmann; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Sheila Homburger; Ryan D Perkins; Douglas Grossman; Garrett Harding; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-10-19

3.  Pharmacogenomic Testing In Pediatrics: Navigating The Ethical, Social, And Legal Challenges.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2019-10-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.