Literature DB >> 23503693

Bridging the Communication Divide: A Role for Health Psychology in the Genomic Era.

Kenneth P Tercyak1, Suzanne C O'Neill, Debra L Roter, Colleen M McBride.   

Abstract

The application of genomics to population health has the potential to revolutionize the practice of medicine. Indeed, discoveries into the genomic basis of cancer and other common chronic diseases have resulted in new and improved predictive tests for identifying individuals at increased risk for these conditions and long before their onset occurs. When used properly, information gained from predictive genomic tests can be combined with other leading indicators (e.g., environmental and behavioral risk factors) to inform medical management decisions, preventive health practices, and risk-reducing strategies. However, genomics remains an emerging science and the translation of genomic discoveries into improved population health management remains elusive. There are divides in the translational science continuum at several junctures, and many of these divides could be narrowed or closed with additional data. For example, we know relatively little about how to effectively communicate with the public about the complex interplay among genomics, behavior, and health. Moreover, there is a need to develop better methods of counseling and educating the public in light of newly emerging knowledge about the genomic basis of health and disease. We assert that the discipline of psychology, and health psychology in particular, is well-poised to continue to make significant contributions to this growing area of science and practice. Through a focus on health-related social and behavioral research, psychology can lead the way in overcoming divides in communication, understanding, and action about genomics for the betterment of both individual and public health practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; communication; genetics; genomics; health

Year:  2012        PMID: 23503693      PMCID: PMC3595505          DOI: 10.1037/a0028971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prof Psychol Res Pr        ISSN: 0735-7028


  71 in total

1.  Genetic testing for disease susceptibilities: consequences for genetic counseling.

Authors:  Roberta A Pagon
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.951

2.  Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Bonnie J Baty; Jamie McDonald; Vickie Venne; Adrian Musters; Debra Roter; William Dudley; Robert T Croyle
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?

Authors:  T Caulfield; N M Ries; P N Ray; C Shuman; B Wilson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Kimberly M Kelly; Maija Reblin; Seth Latimer; Debra Roter
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-09

5.  A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychosocial effects of BRCA1 testing.

Authors:  J R Botkin; R T Croyle; K R Smith; B J Baty; C Lerman; D E Goldgar; J M Ward; B J Flick; J E Nash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Immersive virtual environment technology: a promising tool for future social and behavioral genomics research and practice.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

7.  Interdisciplinarity and systems science to improve population health: a view from the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research.

Authors:  Patricia L Mabry; Deborah H Olster; Glen D Morgan; David B Abrams
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  The role of numeracy on client knowledge in BRCA genetic counseling.

Authors:  David B Portnoy; Debra Roter; Lori H Erby
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-23

9.  Health care providers and direct-to-consumer access and advertising of genetic testing in the United States.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 15.266

10.  ACMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cancer genetic health communication in families tested for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk: a qualitative investigation of impact on children's genetic health literacy and psychosocial adjustment.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Suzanne M Bronheim; Nicole Kahn; Hillary A Robertson; Bruno J Anthony; Darren Mays; Suzanne C O'Neill; Susan K Peterson; Susan Miesfeldt; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Christine Rini; Barbara A Bernhardt; J Scott Roberts; Kurt D Christensen; James P Evans; Kyle B Brothers; Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Acceptability of, and Information Needs Regarding, Next-Generation Sequencing in People Tested for Hereditary Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Ben Storey; Veronica Quinn; Belinda Rahman; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Effectiveness of a self-management intervention with personalised genetic and lifestyle-related risk information on coronary heart disease and diabetes-related risk in type 2 diabetes (CoRDia): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna K Davies; Nadine McGale; Steve E Humphries; Shashivadan P Hirani; Katherine E Beaney; Dauda A S Bappa; John G McCabe; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Opinions of African American adults about the use of apolipoprotein L1 (ApoL1) genetic testing in living kidney donation and transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret Berrigan; Jasmine Austrie; Aaron Fleishman; Kenneth P Tercyak; Martin R Pollak; Martha Pavlakis; Vinayak Rohan; Prabhakar K Baliga; Liise K Kayler; Thomas H Feeley; James R Rodrigue
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 8.086

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.