Literature DB >> 21814850

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography for detecting coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis.

Paola Gargiulo1, Mario Petretta, Dario Bruzzese, Alberto Cuocolo, Maria Prastaro, Carmen D'Amore, Enrico Vassallo, Gianluigi Savarese, Caterina Marciano, Stefania Paolillo, Pasquale Perrone Filardi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis summarized the accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with arterial hypertension.
METHODS: We searched for studies in which stress MPS or stress echocardiography were performed to detect CAD in hypertensive patients, with coronary angiography used as the reference test, published from January 1980 to December 2010. Studies performed in patients with known CAD, acute coronary syndrome and previous revascularization procedures were excluded.
RESULTS: Of 1,263 studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Pooled summary estimates showed that stress MPS had a sensitivity of 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.95] and a specificity of 0.63 (95% CI 0.53-0.72). For stress MPS, the area under the curve (AUC) at the summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) graph was 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.86). At meta-regression analysis, the presence of positive stress electrocardiography as inclusion criterion was the only significant effect modifier (p < 0.01). Pooled summary estimates showed that stress echocardiography had a sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.83) and a specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.93). For stress echocardiography, the AUC at SROC was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93). At the meta-regression analysis no significant effect modifier was detected.
CONCLUSION: MPS has high sensitivity for detecting CAD in hypertensive patients, with specificity comparable to that reported in the general population, whereas stress echocardiography shows higher specificity but substantially reduced sensitivity compared to MPS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21814850     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1891-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  38 in total

1.  The diagnostic value of adenosine stress-contrast echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients: comparison to Tl-201 single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Constadina Aggeli; Euaggelia Christoforatou; Georgios Giannopoulos; Georgios Roussakis; Christos Kokkinakis; John Barbetseas; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Presence of cardiovascular structural changes in essential hypertensive patients with coronary microvascular disease and effects of long-term treatment.

Authors:  A Virdis; L Ghiadoni; A Lucarini; V Di Legge; S Taddei; A Salvetti
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Comparison of exercise electrocardiography, technetium-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography, and dobutamine and dipyridamole echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease in hypertensive women.

Authors:  Chunzeng Lu; Fei Lu; Gabriele Fragasso; Pawel Dabrowski; Vitantonio Di Bello; Sergio L Chierchia; Luigi Gianolli; Mario Marzilli; Alberto Balbarini
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Scintigraphic and electrocardiographic evidence of silent coronary artery disease in asymptomatic hypertension: a case-control study.

Authors:  B M Massie; Y Szlachcic; J F Tubau; B F O'Kelly; S Ammon; W Chin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  A negative thallium (+/- dipyridamole) stress test excludes significant obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  L M Prisant; T W von Dohlen; J L Houghton; A A Carr; M J Frank
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Dipyridamole echocardiography in essential hypertensive patients with chest pain.

Authors:  E Picano; A R Lucarini; F Lattanzi; A Distante; V Di Legge; A Salvetti; A L'Abbate
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  [Dipyridamole-echocardiography and thallium exercise myocardial scintigraphy in the diagnosis of obstructive coronary or microvascular disease in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and angina].

Authors:  C Astarita; E Nicolai; E Liguori; S Gambardella; S Rumolo; F S Maresca
Journal:  G Ital Cardiol       Date:  1998-09

8.  Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Axel Kuettner; Tobias Trabold; Stephen Schroeder; Anja Feyer; Torsten Beck; Ariane Brueckner; Martin Heuschmid; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas F Kopp; Claus D Claussen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Marie E Weswood; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick N M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Utility of Imaging in Risk Stratification of Chest Pain in Women.

Authors:  Emily S Lau; Amy Sarma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Valeria Cantoni; Roberta Green; Francesca Maio; Stefania Daniele; Carmela Nappi; Valeria Gaudieri; Giorgio Punzo; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in elderly patients with hypertension: a 10-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Luca Nai Fovino; Giorgio Saladini; Anna Rita Cervino; Francesca Saladini; Michele Gregianin; Renato Razzolini; Laura Evangelista
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

Authors:  Kelly M T Schmidt; John Nan; Dawn C Scantlebury; Niti R Aggarwal
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-07

5.  Prediction of 8-year cardiovascular outcomes in patients with systemic arterial hypertension: value of stress (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging in a high-risk cohort.

Authors:  Marisa C G Tjong Joe Wai; Machiel J M Ottenhof; Hendrik J Boiten; Roelf Valkema; Ron T van Domburg; Arend F L Schinkel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Clinical implications of referral bias in the diagnostic performance of exercise testing for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Saul Blecker; Michael R Elashoff; Jerome J Federspiel; Dorice L Vieira; Gaurav Sharma; Mark Monane; Steven Rosenberg; Charles E Phelps; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 7.  Women and Ischemic Heart Disease: Recognition, Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Seong-Mi Park; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  W Annefloor van Enst; Eleanor Ochodo; Rob J P M Scholten; Lotty Hooft; Mariska M Leeflang
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.