Literature DB >> 21814828

Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens.

Madoka Takao1, Naomi Kakushima, Kohei Takizawa, Masaki Tanaka, Yuichiro Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Kimihide Kusafuka, Hiroyuki Ono.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A preoperative histologic diagnosis of neoplasia is a requirement for endoscopic resection (ER). However, discrepancies may occur between histologic diagnoses based on biopsy specimens versus ER specimens. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of discrepancy between histologic diagnoses from biopsy specimens and ER specimens.
METHODS: A total of 1705 gastric lesions, from 1419 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of neoplasia, were treated by ER from September 2002 to December 2008. We compared the histologic diagnosis from the biopsy sample and the final diagnosis from the ER specimen to assess the discrepancy rate. Clinicopathological characteristics of the lesions that were related to the histologic discrepancies were also studied.
RESULTS: An ER diagnosis of gastric cancer was made in 49% (118/241) of lesions diagnosed as borderline lesions from biopsy specimens; this included adenomas and lesions difficult to diagnose as regenerative or neoplastic. The size, existence of a depressed area, and ulceration findings were significant factors observed in these lesions. An ER diagnosis of differentiated type cancer was obtained for 17% (12/63) of lesions diagnosed as undifferentiated type cancer from the biopsy specimens; for these lesions, the color and a mixed histology were significant factors related to the histologic discrepancies.
CONCLUSION: A biopsy diagnosis of borderline lesions or undifferentiated type cancer is more likely to disagree with the diagnosis from ER specimens. Endoscopic characteristics should be considered together with the biopsy diagnosis to determine the treatment strategy for these lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21814828     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0075-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  11 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neoplasms.

Authors:  Naomi Kakushima; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Histologic diagnosis based on forceps biopsy is not adequate for determining endoscopic treatment of gastric adenomatous lesions.

Authors:  Y J Kim; J C Park; J-H Kim; S K Shin; S K Lee; Y C Lee; J B Chung
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of forceps biopsy versus polypectomy for gastric polyps: a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  S M Muehldorfer; M Stolte; P Martus; E G Hahn; C Ell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Review of histological classifications of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: differences in diagnosis of early carcinomas between Japanese and Western pathologists.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; Y Kato; M Stolte
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition -

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  The efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection in the diagnosis and treatment of group III gastric lesions.

Authors:  Takao Katsube; Soichi Konnno; Kanako Hamaguchi; Takeshi Shimakawa; Yoshihiko Naritaka; Kenji Ogawa; Motohiko Aiba
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Diagnosis of borderline adenomas of the stomach by endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Y Fujiwara; T Arakawa; T Fukuda; S Kimura; T Uchida; A Obata; K Higuchi; K Wakasa; M Sakurai; K Kobayashi
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited.

Authors:  M F Dixon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Endoscopic characteristics of gastric adenomas suggesting carcinomatous transformation.

Authors:  Min Kyu Jung; Seong Woo Jeon; Soo Young Park; Chang Min Cho; Won Young Tak; Young Oh Kweon; Sung Kook Kim; Yong Hwan Choi; Han Ik Bae
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Usefulness of a novel electrosurgical knife, the insulation-tipped diathermic knife-2, for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ono; Noriaki Hasuike; Tetsuya Inui; Kohei Takizawa; Hisatomo Ikehara; Yuichiro Yamaguchi; Yosuke Otake; Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 7.370

View more
  38 in total

1.  Additive Effect of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Diagnosing Mixed-Type Early Gastric Cancers.

Authors:  Yusuke Horiuchi; Yoshitaka Tokai; Noriko Yamamoto; Shoichi Yoshimizu; Akiyoshi Ishiyama; Toshiyuki Yoshio; Toshiaki Hirasawa; Yorimasa Yamamoto; Masatsugu Nagahama; Hiroshi Takahashi; Tomohiro Tsuchida; Junko Fujisaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Ji Min Choi; Sang Gyun Kim; Hyo-Joon Yang; Joo Hyun Lim; Jeongmin Choi; Jong Pil Im; Joo Sung Kim; Woo Ho Kim; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.

Authors:  Naomi Kakushima; Hideyuki Kanemoto; Masaki Tanaka; Kohei Takizawa; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes of histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Choong Nam Shim; Hyunki Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Hyun Soo Chung; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The value of diagnostic endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with clinical submucosal invasive early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujiya; Kohei Takizawa; Masanori Tokunaga; Noboru Kawata; Makoto Hikage; Rie Makuuchi; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masaki Tanaka; Naomi Kakushima; Hiroyuki Ono; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Long-Term Outcome After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Non-neoplastic Pathology Results.

Authors:  Yong Hwan Kwon; Seong Woo Jeon; Su Youn Nam; Hyun Seok Lee; Jeong Shik Kim; Ji Young Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Risk factors for under-diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic forceps biopsy in comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Guifang Xu; Weijie Zhang; Ying Lv; Bin Zhang; Qi Sun; Tingsheng Ling; Xiaoqi Zhang; Zhihua Zhou; Lei Wang; Qin Huang; Xiaoping Zou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Hye Kyung Jeon; Seong Jun Lee; Gwang Ha Kim; Do Youn Park; Bong Eun Lee; Geun Am Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Discrepancies in the histologic type between biopsy and resected specimens: a cautionary note for mixed-type gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuhei Komatsu; Daisuke Ichikawa; Mahito Miyamae; Toshiyuki Kosuga; Hirotaka Konishi; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Kazuma Okamoto; Mitsuo Kishimoto; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Endoscopic resection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer: focusing on histologic discrepancies between forceps biopsy-based and endoscopic resection specimen-based diagnosis.

Authors:  Byung-Hoon Min; Ki Joo Kang; Jun Haeng Lee; Eun Ran Kim; Yang Won Min; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jong Chul Rhee; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.