BACKGROUND: Pretreatment biopsy may not correctly diagnose mixed-type early gastric cancers. Despite reports on the usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in diagnosing early gastric cancers, no reports exist on differences in magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings between differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type early gastric cancers. AIM: This study aimed to clarify differences in magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings and investigate the additive effect of combining magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and biopsy findings for pretreatment histological-type diagnosis. METHODS: Patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection as initial treatment between April 2005 and March 2017 participated in this retrospective study. There were 156 differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and 36 undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions. We extracted the most significant magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings of differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions using multivariate analysis and compared the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity between pretreatment biopsy alone and a combination of biopsy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings. RESULTS: Significant magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings was fine network pattern in differentiated-type-predominant and corkscrew pattern in undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were significantly higher with combined biopsy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings than with pretreatment biopsy alone. CONCLUSIONS: The study results demonstrated the additive effect of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging with biopsy for diagnosing mixed-type early gastric cancers. This study may be beneficial in routine practice because it indicates a possibility of reducing additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal resection because of incorrect diagnosis of histological type.
BACKGROUND: Pretreatment biopsy may not correctly diagnose mixed-type early gastric cancers. Despite reports on the usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in diagnosing early gastric cancers, no reports exist on differences in magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings between differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type early gastric cancers. AIM: This study aimed to clarify differences in magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings and investigate the additive effect of combining magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and biopsy findings for pretreatment histological-type diagnosis. METHODS:Patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection as initial treatment between April 2005 and March 2017 participated in this retrospective study. There were 156 differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and 36 undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions. We extracted the most significant magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings of differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type and undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions using multivariate analysis and compared the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity between pretreatment biopsy alone and a combination of biopsy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings. RESULTS: Significant magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings was fine network pattern in differentiated-type-predominant and corkscrew pattern in undifferentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were significantly higher with combined biopsy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging findings than with pretreatment biopsy alone. CONCLUSIONS: The study results demonstrated the additive effect of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging with biopsy for diagnosing mixed-type early gastric cancers. This study may be beneficial in routine practice because it indicates a possibility of reducing additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal resection because of incorrect diagnosis of histological type.
Authors: Hyun Lim; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Young Soo Park; Hee Kyong Na; Ji Yong Ahn; Ji Young Choi; Jeong Hoon Lee; Mi-Young Kim; Kwi-Sook Choi; Do Hoon Kim; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Jin-Ho Kim Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: William H Allum; Jane M Blazeby; S Michael Griffin; David Cunningham; Janusz A Jankowski; Rachel Wong Journal: Gut Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 23.059