| Literature DB >> 21813793 |
Marko Elovainio1, Jane E Ferrie, Archana Singh-Manoux, Martin Shipley, G David Batty, Jenny Head, Mark Hamer, Markus Jokela, Marianna Virtanen, Eric Brunner, Michael G Marmot, Mika Kivimäki.
Abstract
In this study, the health-related selection hypothesis (that health predicts social mobility) and the social causation hypothesis (that socioeconomic status influences health) were tested in relation to cardiometabolic factors. The authors screened 8,312 United Kingdom men and women 3 times over 10 years between 1991 and 2004 for waist circumference, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, serum lipids, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6; identified participants with the metabolic syndrome; and measured childhood health retrospectively. Health-related selection was examined in 2 ways: 1) childhood health problems as predictors of adult occupational position and 2) adult cardiometabolic factors as predictors of subsequent promotion at work. Social causation was assessed using adult occupational position as a predictor of subsequent change in cardiometabolic factors. Hospitalization during childhood and lower birth weight were associated with lower occupational position (both P's ≤ 0.002). Cardiometabolic factors in adulthood did not consistently predict promotion. In contrast, lower adult occupational position predicted adverse changes in several cardiometabolic factors (waist circumference, body mass index, fasting glucose, and fasting insulin) and an increased risk of new-onset metabolic syndrome (all P's ≤ 0.008). These findings suggest that health-related selection operates at younger ages and that social causation contributes to socioeconomic differences in cardiometabolic health in midlife.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21813793 PMCID: PMC3176829 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Epidemiol ISSN: 0002-9262 Impact factor: 4.897
Cross-Sectional Association of Whitehall II Employment Grade With Other Indicators of Socioeconomic Status, Whitehall II Study, 1991–2004
| Whitehall II Employment Grade | Pearson’s | |||||||||||||
| Unified Grades 1–6 (High) | Unified Grade 7 | Senior Executive Officer | Higher Executive Officer | Executive Officer | Clerical/Support Staff (Low) | |||||||||
| No. of Participants | % | No. of Participants | % | No. of Participants | % | No. of Participants | % | No. of Participants | % | No. of Participants | % | |||
| United Kingdom Registrar General social class | ||||||||||||||
| I (high) | 899 | 63 | 0.73 | <0.0001 | ||||||||||
| II | 529 | 37 | 1,744 | 100 | 1,169 | 100 | 1,397 | 99 | 944 | 81 | 5 | 0 | ||
| IIIn | 8 | 1 | 224 | 19 | 1,095 | 79 | ||||||||
| IIIm | 1 | 0 | 236 | 17 | ||||||||||
| IV | ||||||||||||||
| V (low) | 61 | 4 | ||||||||||||
| Years of education | ||||||||||||||
| >18 | 583 | 75 | 843 | 64 | 464 | 42 | 578 | 39 | 336 | 28 | 332 | 18 | 0.43 | <0.0001 |
| 17–18 | 113 | 15 | 288 | 22 | 344 | 31 | 480 | 33 | 334 | 28 | 323 | 18 | ||
| ≤16 | 78 | 10 | 180 | 14 | 307 | 28 | 413 | 28 | 516 | 43 | 1,168 | 64 | ||
| Annual income | ||||||||||||||
| <£15,000 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 15 | 4 | 220 | 50 | 0.90 | <0.0001 | ||
| £15,000–<£20,000 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 204 | 51 | 193 | 43 | ||
| £20,000–<£25,000 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 22 | 5 | 357 | 63 | 116 | 29 | 25 | 6 | ||
| £25,000–<£35,000 | 12 | 2 | 116 | 16 | 372 | 85 | 165 | 29 | 58 | 14 | 5 | 1 | ||
| £35,000–<£50,000 | 178 | 30 | 565 | 77 | 37 | 9 | 16 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ||
| ≥£50,000 | 389 | 66 | 36 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
Data were drawn from phase 3 (1991–1993) of the Whitehall II Study.
Data were drawn from phase 1 (1985–1988) of the Whitehall II Study.
Data were drawn from phase 5 (1997–1999) of the Whitehall II Study.
Characteristics of Participants at Baseline and Follow-up, Whitehall II Study, 1991–2004
| Baseline (Phase 3, 1991–1993) | Follow-up (Phase 7, 2003–2004) | |||||
| Mean (SD) | No. of Participants | % | Mean (SD) | No. of Participants | % | |
| Age, years | 49.6 (6.1) | 8,312 | 61.2 (6.0) | 6,586 | ||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 5,733 | 69.0 | 4,627 | 70.3 | ||
| Female | 2,579 | 31.0 | 1,959 | 29.7 | ||
| Race/ethnicity | ||||||
| White | 7,542 | 91.1 | 6,068 | 92.3 | ||
| Nonwhite | 741 | 8.9 | 510 | 7.8 | ||
| Employment grade | ||||||
| Unified grades 1–6 (high) | 1,428 | 17.2 | 1,655 | 25.5 | ||
| Unified grade 7 | 1,744 | 21.0 | 1,299 | 20.0 | ||
| Senior executive officer | 1,169 | 14.0 | 986 | 15.2 | ||
| Higher executive officer | 1,405 | 16.9 | 1,010 | 15.6 | ||
| Executive officer | 1,169 | 14.1 | 823 | 12.7 | ||
| Clerical/support staff (low) | 1,397 | 16.8 | 709 | 10.9 | ||
| Promotion during follow-up | ||||||
| No | 5,291 | 81.6 | ||||
| Yes | 1,194 | 18.4 | ||||
| Waist circumference, cm | 85.8 (11.6) | 7,822 | 93.6 (12.3) | 6,151 | ||
| Body mass index | 25.3 (3.7) | 7,901 | 26.7 (4.4) | 6,146 | ||
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 120.6 (13.6) | 7,905 | 128.2 (16.8) | 6,168 | ||
| Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 79.7 (9.4) | 7,904 | 74.4 (10.5) | 6,167 | ||
| High density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.43 (0.41) | 7,840 | 1.58 (0.45) | 6,073 | ||
| Low density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.39 (1.04) | 7,714 | 3.50 (1.63) | 6,004 | ||
| Fasting glucose, mmol/L | 5.24 (0.69) | 7,559 | 5.47 (1.32) | 6,063 | ||
| Fasting insulin, pmol/L | 6.97 (6.07) | 7,074 | 10.08 (12.24) | 5,479 | ||
| C-reactive protein, mg/L | 1.93 (4.35) | 7,475 | 2.59 (5.09) | 5,895 | ||
| Interleukin-6, pg/mL | 1.94 (2.29) | 7,421 | 2.34 (2.13) | 5,451 | ||
| Metabolic syndrome | ||||||
| Yes | 836 | 10.8 | 823 | 13.6 | ||
| No | 6,935 | 89.2 | 5,250 | 86.4 | ||
| Status in phase 7 | ||||||
| Employed in civil service | 2,010 | 24.2 | ||||
| Left civil service | 1,048 | 12.6 | ||||
| Retired | 3,424 | 41.2 | ||||
| Nonrespondent | 1,411 | 17.0 | ||||
| Died | 314 | 3.8 | ||||
| Unknown | 105 | 1.3 | ||||
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Weight (kg)/height (m)2.
Metabolic syndrome status was determined using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria based on waist circumference, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose (35).
Test of the Health-related Selection Hypothesis (That Health Predicts Social Mobility) and the Social Causation Hypothesis (That Socioeconomic Status Influences Health), Whitehall II Study, 1991–2004
| Exposure | Outcome | No. of Participants | Estimate | |||
| Regression Coefficient | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | ||||
| Health-related selection (from childhood to adulthood) hypothesis | ||||||
| Hospitalization in childhood (1 = yes, 0 = no) | Employment grade | 6,547 | −0.23 | −0.34, −0.13 | <0.0001 | |
| Birth weight, per pound | Employment grade | 5,294 | 0.05 | 0.02, 0.08 | 0.002 | |
| Health-related selection (adulthood) hypothesis | ||||||
| Waist circumference, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion (1 = yes, 0 = no) | 6,153 | 1.04 | 0.96, 1.12 | 0.32 | |
| Body mass index | 10-year promotion | 6,219 | 1.03 | 0.97, 1.10 | 0.38 | |
| Systolic blood pressure, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 6,229 | 1.01 | 0.94, 1.08 | 0.75 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 6,228 | 0.99 | 0.93, 1.06 | 0.80 | |
| HDL cholesterol, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 6,175 | 0.96 | 0.90, 1.04 | 0.31 | |
| LDL cholesterol, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 6,076 | 1.08 | 1.00, 1.15 | 0.04 | |
| Fasting glucose, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 5,967 | 0.96 | 0.89, 1.05 | 0.37 | |
| Fasting insulin, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 5,567 | 1.02 | 0.95, 1.10 | 0.63 | |
| Log C-reactive protein, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 5,881 | 1.06 | 0.99, 1.14 | 0.08 | |
| Log interleukin-6, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 5,839 | 0.98 | 0.91, 1.05 | 0.52 | |
| Metabolic syndrome (1 = yes, 0 = no) | 10-year promotion | 6,127 | 1.18 | 0.95, 1.47 | 0.13 | |
| Social causation (adulthood) hypothesis | 10-year change in: | |||||
| Employment grade | Waist circumference, cm | 5,868 | −0.16 | −0.28, −0.04 | 0.008 | |
| Employment grade | Body mass index | 5,925 | −0.06 | −0.10, −0.03 | 0.0003 | |
| Employment grade | Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 5,953 | 0.02 | −0.23, 0.28 | 0.86 | |
| Employment grade | Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 5,951 | 0.26 | 0.09, 0.43 | 0.003 | |
| Employment grade | HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 5,824 | 0.015 | 0.010, 0.020 | <0.0001 | |
| Employment grade | LDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 5,691 | 0.022 | 0.006, 0.039 | 0.007 | |
| Employment grade | Fasting glucose, mmol/L | 5,632 | −0.05 | −0.07, −0.03 | <0.0001 | |
| Employment grade | Fasting insulin, pmol/L | 4,822 | −0.43 | −0.61,−0.24 | <0.0001 | |
| Employment grade | Log C-reactive protein, mg/L | 5,421 | −0.00 | −0.02, 0.02 | 0.90 | |
| Employment grade | Log interleukin-6, pg/mL | 4,979 | 0.000 | −0.011, 0.012 | 0.93 | |
| Employment grade | Metabolic syndrome at follow-up (1 = yes, 0 = no) | 5,208 | 0.88 | 0.83, 0.94 | <0.0001 | |
Abbreviations: HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; SD, standard deviation.
In all models, results were adjusted for age and sex. The test of the association between employment grade and metabolic syndrome at follow-up was based on participants with no metabolic syndrome at baseline.
Civil service employment grade, in 6 levels, was used as the measure of socioeconomic status.
Weight (kg)/height (m)2.
Test of the Health-related Selection and Social Causation Hypotheses After Multiple Multivariate Imputation for Missing Values (n = 8,312a), Whitehall II Study, 1991–2004
| Exposure | Outcome | Estimate | |||
| Regression Coefficient | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | |||
| Health-related selection (from childhood to adulthood) hypothesis | |||||
| Hospitalization in childhood (1 = yes, 0 = no) | Employment grade | −0.24 | −0.35, −0.13 | <0.0001 | |
| Birth weight, per pound | Employment grade | 0.05 | 0.03, 0.07 | 0.008 | |
| Health-related selection (adulthood) hypothesis | |||||
| Waist circumference, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion (1 = yes, 0 = no) | 1.02 | 0.95, 1.11 | 0.59 | |
| Body mass index | 10-year promotion | 1.03 | 0.96, 1.11 | 0.43 | |
| Systolic blood pressure, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 0.99 | 0.92, 1.06 | 0.79 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 0.97 | 0.91, 1.04 | 0.43 | |
| HDL cholesterol, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 0.98 | 0.90, 1.07 | 0.59 | |
| LDL cholesterol, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 1.05 | 0.99, 1.13 | 0.12 | |
| Fasting glucose, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 0.99 | 0.91, 1.06 | 0.78 | |
| Fasting insulin, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 1.00 | 0.92, 1.07 | 0.94 | |
| Log C-reactive protein, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 1.04 | 0.97, 1.13 | 0.21 | |
| Log interleukin-6, per 1-SD increase | 10-year promotion | 0.96 | 0.90, 1.03 | 0.22 | |
| Metabolic syndrome (1 = yes, 0 = no) | 10-year promotion | 1.13 | 0.94, 1.31 | 0.16 | |
| Social causation (adulthood) hypothesis | 10-year change in: | ||||
| Employment grade | Waist circumference, cm | −0.13 | −0.23, −0.03 | 0.009 | |
| Employment grade | Body mass index | −0.06 | −0.08, −0.03 | 0.0002 | |
| Employment grade | Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | −0.10 | −0.31, 0.12 | 0.38 | |
| Employment grade | Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 0.13 | −0.01, 0.28 | 0.07 | |
| Employment grade | HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 0.013 | 0.009, 0.017 | <0.0001 | |
| Employment grade | LDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 0.020 | −0.001, 0.042 | 0.06 | |
| Employment grade | Fasting glucose, mmol/L | −0.06 | −0.07, −0.04 | <0.0001 | |
| Employment grade | Fasting insulin, pmol/L | −0.40 | −0.55, −0.24 | <0.0001 | |
| Employment grade | Log C-reactive protein, mg/L | 0.00 | −0.01, 0.02 | 0.56 | |
| Employment grade | Log interleukin-6, pg/mL | 0.004 | −0.004, 0.013 | 0.37 | |
| Employment grade | Metabolic syndrome at follow-up (1 = yes, 0 = no) | 0.90 | 0.85, 0.94 | <0.0001 | |
Abbreviations: HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; SD, standard deviation.
n = 8,312 in each of the 10 imputed copies of the data set.
In all models, results were adjusted for age and sex. The test of the association between employment grade and metabolic syndrome at follow-up was based on participants with no metabolic syndrome at baseline.
Civil service employment grade, in 6 levels, was used as the measure of socioeconomic status.
Weight (kg)/height (m)2.