Literature DB >> 17618718

The problems of relative deprivation: why some societies do better than others.

Richard G Wilkinson1, Kate E Pickett.   

Abstract

In this paper, we present evidence which suggests that key processes of social status differentiation, affecting health and numerous other social outcomes, take place at the societal level. Understanding them seems likely to involve analyses and comparisons of whole societies. Using income inequality as an indicator and determinant of the scale of socioeconomic stratification in a society, we show that many problems associated with relative deprivation are more prevalent in more unequal societies. We summarise previously published evidence suggesting that this may be true of morbidity and mortality, obesity, teenage birth rates, mental illness, homicide, low trust, low social capital, hostility, and racism. To these we add new analyses which suggest that this is also true of poor educational performance among school children, the proportion of the population imprisoned, drug overdose mortality and low social mobility. That ill health and a wide range of other social problems associated with social status within societies are also more common in more unequal societies, may imply that income inequality is central to the creation of the apparently deep-seated social problems associated with poverty, relative deprivation or low social status. We suggest that the degree of material inequality in a society may not only be central to the social forces involved in national patterns of social stratification, but also that many of the problems related to low social status may be amenable to changes in income distribution. If the prevalence of these problems varies so much from society to society according to differences in income distribution, it suggests that the familiar social gradients in health and other outcomes are unlikely to result from social mobility sorting people merely by prior characteristics. Instead, the picture suggests that their frequency in a population is affected by the scale of social stratification that differs substantially from one society to another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618718     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  89 in total

1.  The myth of meritocracy and African American health.

Authors:  Naa Oyo A Kwate; Ilan H Meyer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Symbolic capital, consumption, and health inequality.

Authors:  Elizabeth Sweet
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Anxious? Depressed? You might be suffering from capitalism: contradictory class locations and the prevalence of depression and anxiety in the USA.

Authors:  Seth J Prins; Lisa M Bates; Katherine M Keyes; Carles Muntaner
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-08-03

Review 4.  Maternal and pediatric health and disease: integrating biopsychosocial models and epigenetics.

Authors:  Lewis P Rubin
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Income inequality and socioeconomic gradients in mortality.

Authors:  Richard G Wilkinson; Kate E Pickett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Political and social context of not attaining the Millennium Development Goal to reduce poverty.

Authors:  Marco Palma-Solís; Diana Gil-González; Carlos Alvarez-Dardet; María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Examining the lag time between state-level income inequality and individual disabilities: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Tahany M Gadalla; Esme Fuller-Thomson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Do post-migration perceptions of social mobility matter for Latino immigrant health?

Authors:  Carmela Alcántara; Chih-Nan Chen; Margarita Alegría
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: how societies mind the gap.

Authors:  Federica Durante; Susan T Fiske; Nicolas Kervyn; Amy J C Cuddy; Adebowale Debo Akande; Bolanle E Adetoun; Modupe F Adewuyi; Magdeline M Tserere; Ananthi Al Ramiah; Khairul Anwar Mastor; Fiona Kate Barlow; Gregory Bonn; Romin W Tafarodi; Janine Bosak; Ed Cairns; Claire Doherty; Dora Capozza; Anjana Chandran; Xenia Chryssochoou; Tilemachos Iatridis; Juan Manuel Contreras; Rui Costa-Lopes; Roberto González; Janet I Lewis; Gerald Tushabe; Jacques-Philippe Leyens; Renée Mayorga; Nadim N Rouhana; Vanessa Smith Castro; Rolando Perez; Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón; Miguel Moya; Elena Morales Marente; Marisol Palacios Gálvez; Chris G Sibley; Frank Asbrock; Chiara C Storari
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-10-05

10.  Getting Under the Skin: Children's Health Disparities as Embodiment of Social Class.

Authors:  Michael R Kramer; Eric B Schneider; Jennifer B Kane; Claire Margerison-Zilko; Jessica Jones-Smith; Katherine King; Pamela Davis-Kean; Joseph G Grzywacz
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2017-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.