Tasneem Khambaty1, Neil Schneiderman2, Maria M Llabre2, Tali Elfassy2, Ashley E Moncrieft2, Martha Daviglus3, Gregory A Talavera4, Carmen R Isasi5, Linda C Gallo6, Samantha A Reina2, Denise Vidot2, Gerardo Heiss7. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Math/Psychology 326, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA. khambaty@umbc.edu. 2. Department of Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Research Center, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. 6. Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. 7. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic (SES) factors underlying disparities in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) and consequently, type 2 diabetes among Hispanics/Latino populations are of considerable clinical and public health interest. However, incomplete and/or imprecise measurement of the multidimensional SES construct has impeded a full understanding of how SES contributes to disparities in metabolic disease. Consequently, a latent-variable model of the SES-MetSyn association was investigated and compared with the more typical proxy-variable model. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional probability sample (2008-2011) of 14,029 Hispanic/Latino individuals of Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican, Central American, South American, and Mexican ancestry living in the USA was used. SES proxy's education, income, and employment were examined as effect indicators of a latent variable, and as individual predictors. MetSyn was defined using 2009 harmonized guidelines, and MetSyn components were also examined individually. RESULTS: In multivariate regression analyses, the SES latent variable was associated with 9% decreased odds of MetSyn (95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.96, P < .001) and was associated with all MetSyn components, except diastolic blood pressure. Additionally, greater income, education, and employment status were associated with 4%, 3%, and 24% decreased odds of having MetSyn, respectively (Ps < .001). The income-MetSyn association was only significant for women and those with current health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic/Latinos exhibit an inverse association between SES and MetSyn of varying magnitudes across SES variables. Public health research is needed to further probe these relationships, particularly among Hispanic/Latina women, to ultimately improve healthcare access to prevent diabetes in this underserved population.
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic (SES) factors underlying disparities in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) and consequently, type 2 diabetes among Hispanics/Latino populations are of considerable clinical and public health interest. However, incomplete and/or imprecise measurement of the multidimensional SES construct has impeded a full understanding of how SES contributes to disparities in metabolic disease. Consequently, a latent-variable model of the SES-MetSyn association was investigated and compared with the more typical proxy-variable model. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional probability sample (2008-2011) of 14,029 Hispanic/Latino individuals of Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican, Central American, South American, and Mexican ancestry living in the USA was used. SES proxy's education, income, and employment were examined as effect indicators of a latent variable, and as individual predictors. MetSyn was defined using 2009 harmonized guidelines, and MetSyn components were also examined individually. RESULTS: In multivariate regression analyses, the SES latent variable was associated with 9% decreased odds of MetSyn (95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.96, P < .001) and was associated with all MetSyn components, except diastolic blood pressure. Additionally, greater income, education, and employment status were associated with 4%, 3%, and 24% decreased odds of having MetSyn, respectively (Ps < .001). The income-MetSyn association was only significant for women and those with current health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic/Latinos exhibit an inverse association between SES and MetSyn of varying magnitudes across SES variables. Public health research is needed to further probe these relationships, particularly among Hispanic/Latina women, to ultimately improve healthcare access to prevent diabetes in this underserved population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health disparities; Hispanics/Latinos; Latent models; Metabolic syndrome; Socioeconomic status; Women’s health
Authors: William Arguelles; Maria M Llabre; Ralph L Sacco; Frank J Penedo; Mercedes Carnethon; Linda C Gallo; David J Lee; Diane J Catellier; Hector M González; Christina Holub; Laura R Loehr; Elsayed Z Soliman; Neil Schneiderman Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: James A Blumenthal; Michael A Babyak; Alan Hinderliter; Lana L Watkins; Linda Craighead; Pao-Hwa Lin; Carla Caccia; Julie Johnson; Robert Waugh; Andrew Sherwood Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-01-25
Authors: Neil Schneiderman; Maria Llabre; Catherine C Cowie; Janice Barnhart; Mercedes Carnethon; Linda C Gallo; Aida L Giachello; Gerardo Heiss; Robert C Kaplan; Lisa M LaVange; Yanping Teng; Leonel Villa-Caballero; M Larissa Avilés-Santa Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Hector M González; William A Vega; Michael A Rodríguez; Wassim Tarraf; William M Sribney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Juliana Kagura; Linda S Adair; Pedro T Pisa; Paula L Griffiths; John M Pettifor; Shane A Norris Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Linda C Gallo; Kimberly L Savin; Marta M Jankowska; Scott C Roesch; James F Sallis; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Gregory A Talavera; Krista M Perreira; Carmen R Isasi; Frank J Penedo; Maria M Llabre; Mayra L Estrella; Earle C Chambers; Martha L Daviglus; Scott C Brown; Jordan A Carlson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 6.604