Literature DB >> 21813584

Altruism among participants in cancer clinical trials.

Tony H Truong1, Jane C Weeks, E Francis Cook, Steven Joffe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients' motivations for participation in cancer clinical trials are incompletely understood. Even less is known about the factors that influence participants' motivations for enrolling in trials.
PURPOSE: We studied the reasons why adult patients and parents of pediatric patients agree to participate in cancer trials. We focused on the role of altruism across all phases of trial.
METHODS: We surveyed adult patients and parents of pediatric patients participating in phase I, II, or III cancer clinical trials. We asked respondents why they agreed to enroll, and examined correlates of altruistic motivation using univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Among 205 adults and 48 parents of children participating in cancer trials, 47% reported that altruistic motivations were 'very important' to their decisions to enroll. In multivariate analysis with phase III trial participants as the reference group, phase I trial participants least often identified altruism as a 'very important' motivation for enrolling (phase I OR 0.4, 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.2-0.8; phase II OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.5, overall P = 0.017). Thirty-three respondents (13%) reported being motivated primarily by altruism. In multivariate analysis, participants with poor prognoses-defined as an expected 5-year disease-free survival of ≤ 10%-reported altruism as their primary motivation less often than those with better prognoses (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5, P = 0.001). Altruistic motivations did not differ between adult patients and parents of pediatric participants. LIMITATIONS: The data are derived from related academic medical centers in one city, and the study sample reflects limited sociodemographic diversity, thereby limiting generalizability to other settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer trial participants commonly report that altruism contributed to their decision to enroll, it is rarely their primary motivation for study participation. Participants in early phase trials and those with poor prognoses are least often motivated by altruism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21813584     DOI: 10.1177/1740774511414444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  29 in total

1.  Barriers to study enrollment in patients with advanced cancer referred to a phase I clinical trials unit.

Authors:  Siqing Fu; Lacey McQuinn; Aung Naing; Jennifer J Wheler; Filip Janku; Gerald S Falchook; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Dennis Tu; Adrienne Howard; Apostolia Tsimberidou; Ralph Zinner; David S Hong; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-10-23

2.  Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Van Lieou; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Lynda G Balneaves
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Research biopsies in phase I studies: views and perspectives of participants and investigators.

Authors:  Rebecca D Pentz; R Donald Harvey; Margaret White; Zachary Luke Farmer; Olga Dashevskaya; Zhengjia Chen; Colleen Lewis; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Fadlo R Khuri
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

5.  Decision-making Among Hepatitis C Virus-negative Transplant Candidates Offered Organs from Donors with HCV Infection.

Authors:  M Elle Saine; Erin M Schnellinger; Michel Liu; Joshua M Diamond; Maria M Crespo; Stacey Prenner; Vishnu Potluri; Christian Bermudez; Heather Mentch; Michaella Moore; Behdad Besharatian; David S Goldberg; Frances K Barg; Peter P Reese
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Clinical trial participation as part of end-of-life cancer care: associations with medical care and quality of life near death.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Jane C Weeks; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Evaluation of patient enrollment in oncology phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Diane A J van der Biessen; Merlijn A Cranendonk; Gaia Schiavon; Bronno van der Holt; Erik A C Wiemer; Ferry A L M Eskens; Jaap Verweij; Maja J A de Jonge; Ron H J Mathijssen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-02-21

8.  Representation of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in clinical cancer trials.

Authors:  Jennifer M Jabson; John R Blosnich
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Views of adolescents and parents on pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Emily Abdoler; Lori Wiener; Christine Grady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Ethical Issues in Intraoperative Neuroscience Research: Assessing Subjects' Recall of Informed Consent and Motivations for Participation.

Authors:  Anna Wexler; Rebekah J Choi; Ashwin G Ramayya; Nikhil Sharma; Brendan J McShane; Love Y Buch; Melanie P Donley-Fletcher; Joshua I Gold; Gordon H Baltuch; Sara Goering; Eran Klein
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.