Literature DB >> 21810981

A comprehensive evaluation of the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the Oculus Pentacam HR.

Colm McAlinden1, Jyoti Khadka, Konrad Pesudovs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the Pentacam HR (high-resolution) tomographer (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) across a large range of measurement parameters.
METHODS: A randomly selected healthy eye of 100 subjects was scanned twice with the Pentacam HR by one observer for each of the three measurement modes: 25-picture (1 second) scan, 50-picture (2 second) scan, and cornea fine scan (50 pictures in 1 second). The repeatability of each scan mode was assessed. One additional 25-picture scan was acquired by a second observer to test reproducibility.
RESULTS: Overall, the Pentacam HR had good precision, with the cornea fine scan returning the most precise results: The 25- and 50-picture scans showed similar precision. The repeatability limits, expressed as the within-subject SD × 1.96√2 of the anterior keratometry (K)1 and K2 readings with the standard 25-picture scan, were 0.25 and 0.36 D, respectively. Pachymetry maps, corneal maps, anterior chamber depth maps, corneal volume, topometric Q values and indices were also found to be precise. Poor precision was found for estimates of axis (astigmatic and progression index), pupil center pachymetry, single points on corneal maps, refractive power maps, and equivalent K readings.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements taken with the Pentacam HR are repeatable and reproducible, especially those obtained with the cornea fine scan. Although the Pentacam HR is clearly a very useful clinical and research tool, the measurement of corneal axes, pupil center pachymetry, front meridional and axial maps, refractive power maps, and equivalent K readings should be interpreted with caution.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21810981     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-7093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  56 in total

1.  Clinical utility of ocular residual astigmatism and topographic disparity vector indexes in subclinical and clinical keratoconus.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Roberto Soto-Negro; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Alberto Artola
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Corneal power measurement with a new aberrometer/corneal topographer in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction for myopia.

Authors:  Chao Pan; Weina Tan; Yanjun Hua; Xiaohua Lei
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Validation of Fourier analysis of videokeratographic data.

Authors:  Haris Sideroudi; Georgios Labiris; Fienke Ditzel; Efi Tsaragli; Kimonas Georgatzoglou; Haralampos Siganos; Vassilios Kozobolis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Clinical Evaluation and Validation of the Dutch Crosslinking for Keratoconus Score.

Authors:  Robert P L Wisse; Rob W P Simons; Martijn J B van der Vossen; Marc B Muijzer; Nienke Soeters; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Daniel A Godefrooij
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.

Authors:  Shiva Mehravaran; Soheila Asgari; Sara Bigdeli; Ashkan Shahnazi; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 6.  [Corneal topography and keratoconus diagnostics with Scheimpflug photography].

Authors:  J Bühren
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  A comparative evaluation of cataract classifications based on shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound findings.

Authors:  Mesut Ozgokce; Muhammed Batur; Muhammed Alpaslan; Alpaslan Yavuz; Abdussamet Batur; Erbil Seven; Harun Arslan
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-09-03

8.  Evaluation of anterior chamber parameters with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Isabel Pinilla Lozano; Carmen López de la Fuente; Francisco Segura; Elvira Orduna Hospital; Ana Sánchez-Cano
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Jihan Akhtar; Michael J Lynn; Renato Ambrósio; William J Dupps; Ronald R Krueger; Stephen D Klyce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Distribution and internal correlations of corneal astigmatism in cataract patients.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Jiang; Ying Qin; Shaochong Bu; Hong Zhang; Xiaomin Zhang; Fang Tian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.