Literature DB >> 21809169

Dynamic category structure in spatial memory.

Jesse Sargent1, Stephen Dopkins, John Philbeck.   

Abstract

This study examines bias (constant error) in spatial memory in an effort to determine whether this bias is defined by a dynamic egocentric reference frame that moves with the observer or by an environmentally fixed reference frame. Participants learned the locations of six target objects around them in a room, were blindfolded, and then rotated themselves to face particular response headings. From each response heading, participants used a pointer to indicate the remembered azimuthal locations of the objects. Analyses of the angular pointing errors showed a previously observed pattern of bias. More importantly, it appeared that this pattern of bias was defined relative to and moved with the observer--that is, was egocentric and dynamic. These results were interpreted in the framework of a modified category adjustment model as suggesting the existence of dynamic categorical (nonmetric) spatial codes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21809169     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0139-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Location memory biases reveal the challenges of coordinating visual and kinesthetic reference frames.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Clayton Peterson; Warren Darling; John P Spencer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Chunking in spatial memory.

Authors:  Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Parsing surrounding space into regions.

Authors:  N Franklin; L A Henkel; T Zangas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-07

6.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The wall inside the brain: overestimation of distances crossing the former Iron Curtain.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

8.  Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara; Christine M Valiquette; Bjorn Rump
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Memory for spatial location: cue effects as a function of field rotation.

Authors:  Sylvia Fitting; Douglas H Wedell; Gary L Allen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

10.  The coding of spatial location in young children.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; N Newcombe; E H Sandberg
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  From maps to navigation: the role of cues in finding locations in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Adam T Hutcheson; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

2.  Two-category place representations persist over body rotations.

Authors:  Hyoun Kyoung Pyoun; Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.