PURPOSE: An immune function assay has been proposed as a new strategy to monitor immunosuppression after organ transplantation. However, there are limited data regarding its role in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we sought to determine the utility of this functional assay in assessing the risk of infection, rejection, and tumor recurrence in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Immune function was determined by ImmuKnow assay that measures the amount of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) produced by CD4 (+) T cells to monitor the global immune status in 342 whole blood samples from 105 liver transplant recipients. The association between ATP value and post-transplant tumor recurrence was evaluated in 60 HCC patients. The ATP value in predicting tumor recurrence in other independent cohort of 92 recipients with HCC was analyzed prospectively. RESULTS: The mean ATP values of liver transplant recipients with infection (145.2 ± 87.0 ng/ml) or acute rejection (418.9 ± 169.5 ng/ml) were different from those with stable state (286.6 ± 143.9 ng/ml, P < 0.05). In recipients with HCC who developed recurrent tumors, the values were significantly lower than those without recurrence (137.8 ± 66.4 vs. 289 ± 133.9 ng/ml, P < 0.01); the optimal threshold value to predict post-transplant tumor recurrence was 175 ng/ml. Comparing with the patients in lower immune group (ATP ≤ 175 ng/ml), patients in the higher immune group (ATP > 175 ng/ml) experienced significantly better disease-free survival (P < 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed the ATP value was an independent predictor of HCC recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The immune function assay has the potential to assess the risk of infection and rejection in liver transplantation and to predict post-transplant tumor recurrence in recipients with HCC.
PURPOSE: An immune function assay has been proposed as a new strategy to monitor immunosuppression after organ transplantation. However, there are limited data regarding its role in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we sought to determine the utility of this functional assay in assessing the risk of infection, rejection, and tumor recurrence in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Immune function was determined by ImmuKnow assay that measures the amount of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) produced by CD4 (+) T cells to monitor the global immune status in 342 whole blood samples from 105 liver transplant recipients. The association between ATP value and post-transplant tumor recurrence was evaluated in 60 HCC patients. The ATP value in predicting tumor recurrence in other independent cohort of 92 recipients with HCC was analyzed prospectively. RESULTS: The mean ATP values of liver transplant recipients with infection (145.2 ± 87.0 ng/ml) or acute rejection (418.9 ± 169.5 ng/ml) were different from those with stable state (286.6 ± 143.9 ng/ml, P < 0.05). In recipients with HCC who developed recurrent tumors, the values were significantly lower than those without recurrence (137.8 ± 66.4 vs. 289 ± 133.9 ng/ml, P < 0.01); the optimal threshold value to predict post-transplant tumor recurrence was 175 ng/ml. Comparing with the patients in lower immune group (ATP ≤ 175 ng/ml), patients in the higher immune group (ATP > 175 ng/ml) experienced significantly better disease-free survival (P < 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed the ATP value was an independent predictor of HCC recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The immune function assay has the potential to assess the risk of infection and rejection in liver transplantation and to predict post-transplant tumor recurrence in recipients with HCC.
Authors: Richard J Kowalski; Diane R Post; Roslyn B Mannon; Anthony Sebastian; Harlan I Wright; Gary Sigle; James Burdick; Kareem Abu Elmagd; Adriana Zeevi; Mayra Lopez-Cepero; John A Daller; H Albin Gritsch; Elaine F Reed; Johann Jonsson; Douglas Hawkins; Judith A Britz Journal: Transplantation Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Richard Kowalski; Diane Post; Mary C Schneider; Judith Britz; Judy Thomas; Mark Deierhoi; Andrew Lobashevsky; Robert Redfield; Eugene Schweitzer; Alonso Heredia; Elise Reardon; Charles Davis; Carol Bentlejewski; John Fung; Ron Shapiro; Adriana Zeevi Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: R Venkataramanan; L M Shaw; L Sarkozi; R Mullins; J Pirsch; G MacFarlane; D Scheller; D Ersfeld; M Frick; W E Fitzsimmons; M Virji; A Jain; K L Brayman; A Shaked Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Matteo Cescon; Valentina Rosa Bertuzzo; Giorgio Ercolani; Matteo Ravaioli; Federica Odaldi; Antonio Daniele Pinna Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-12-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Alpna R Limaye; Virginia Clark; Consuelo Soldevila-Pico; Giuseppe Morelli; Amitabh Suman; Roberto Firpi; David R Nelson; Roniel Cabrera Journal: Hepatol Res Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 4.288
Authors: Stéphanie Lacotte; Graziano Oldani; Florence Slits; Lorenzo A Orci; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Philippe Morel; Gilles Mentha; Christian Toso Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240