Literature DB >> 11361051

Clinical utility of monitoring tacrolimus blood concentrations in liver transplant patients.

R Venkataramanan1, L M Shaw, L Sarkozi, R Mullins, J Pirsch, G MacFarlane, D Scheller, D Ersfeld, M Frick, W E Fitzsimmons, M Virji, A Jain, K L Brayman, A Shaked.   

Abstract

The relationship between the dose of tacrolimus, trough tacrolimus blood concentration, and selected clinical endpoints (acute rejection, nephrotoxicity, and other toxicities) were examined in a prospective, multicenter clinical trial to validate the use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for monitoring whole-blood concentrations of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients. A total of 111 subjects from six transplant centers were evaluated over 12 weeks posttransplantation. In addition to trough tacrolimus blood concentrations, hematocrit, ALT, AST, GGTP, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, BUN, serum potassium, serum magnesium, blood glucose, and serum albumin were also measured. The relationship between trough tacrolimus blood concentrations and clinical endpoints was analyzed using both a logistic regression model and a Cox proportional hazard model. By logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant (p = 0.0465) relationship between increasing trough tacrolimus blood concentrations and decreasing risk of acute rejection was demonstrated over a 7-day time window. Nephrotoxicity and other toxicities also demonstrated statistically significant relationships with trough tacrolimus blood concentrations. The results of the Cox analysis were consistent with the logistic regression analysis. Using receiver operator characteristic curves, trough tacrolimus concentrations as measured by the ELISA method were able to differentiate the occurrence of nephrotoxicity and toxicity from nonevents. To minimize nephrotoxicity of tacrolimus, it is necessary to maintain trough blood concentrations below 15 ng/ml. This study demonstrates that the ELISA method used to measure tacrolimus blood concentrations in this study provides information of predictive value for managing the risk of nephrotoxicity, other toxicity, and rejection in liver transplant patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11361051     DOI: 10.1177/00912700122010429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  30 in total

1.  Donor CYP3A5 genotype influences tacrolimus disposition on the first day after paediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Pier Luigi Calvo; Loredana Serpe; Andrea Brunati; Antonello Nonnato; Daniela Bongioanni; Dominic Dell' Olio; Michele Pinon; Carlo Ferretti; Francesco Tandoi; Giulia Carbonaro; Mauro Salizzoni; Antonio Amoroso; Renato Romagnoli; Roberto Canaparo
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimator for 2 tacrolimus formulations in adult liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Camille Riff; Jean Debord; Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet; Jean-Baptiste Woillard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in full liver transplant patients: modelling of the post-operative clearance.

Authors:  Marie Antignac; Jean Sebastien Hulot; Emmanuel Boleslawski; Laurent Hannoun; Yvan Touitou; Robert Farinotti; Philippe Lechat; Saïk Urien
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Immune monitoring post liver transplant.

Authors:  Siddharth Sood; Adam G Testro
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-03-24

5.  In vitro and in vivo performance of dry powder inhalation formulations: comparison of particles prepared by thin film freezing and micronization.

Authors:  Yi-Bo Wang; Alan B Watts; Jay I Peters; Sha Liu; Ayesha Batra; Robert O Williams
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Performance of the Dimension TAC assay and comparison of multiple platforms for the measurement of tacrolimus.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Cho; Dae-Hyun Ko; Woochang Lee; Sail Chun; Hae-Kyung Lee; Won-Ki Min
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Determination of the most influential sources of variability in tacrolimus trough blood concentrations in adult liver transplant recipients: a bottom-up approach.

Authors:  Cécile Gérard; Jeanick Stocco; Anne Hulin; Benoit Blanchet; Céline Verstuyft; François Durand; Filomena Conti; Christophe Duvoux; Michel Tod
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Bayesian Estimation of Tacrolimus Exposure: Is this Clinically Useful for Dosage Prediction Yet?

Authors:  Emily Brooks; Susan E Tett; Nicole M Isbel; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infected liver transplant recipients in the ANRS HC-08 study.

Authors:  Elina Teicher; Isabelle Vincent; Laurence Bonhomme-Faivre; Chadi Abbara; Aurélie Barrail; Alain Boissonnas; Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée; Anne-Marie Taburet; Didier Samuel; Daniel Vittecoq
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.