Literature DB >> 21808269

The inverted pyramid of biomarker-driven trials.

Ignacio Garrido-Laguna1, Manuel Hidalgo, Razelle Kurzrock.   

Abstract

In the past, clinical phase I trials often suffered from low response rates and inadequate experimental drug doses. Over the past decade, however, phase I trials have evolved from simple dose-finding studies to trials that might provide clinically relevant therapeutic opportunities for patients with advanced-stage cancer for which no standard therapies are available. In the future, the routine use of modern technologies such as large-scale genome sequencing will help to unravel the specific biology of a patient's cancer. Such tools will expand our knowledge about genetic aberrations and might provide opportunities for the development of novel, molecular targeted therapies for patients with refractory cancer. Increasingly, the focus will likely turn from carrying out large randomized trials in unselected patients to conducting smaller biomarker-driven trials in selected patients with known molecular aberrations. We expect that these new strategies will enhance response rates as appropriate patients are targeted, therefore sparing those patients who are unlikely to benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21808269     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  59 in total

Review 1.  Trends in the use and role of biomarkers in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Bernardo H L Goulart; Jeffrey W Clark; Homer H Pien; Thomas G Roberts; Stan N Finkelstein; Bruce A Chabner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR.

Authors:  Makoto Maemondo; Akira Inoue; Kunihiko Kobayashi; Shunichi Sugawara; Satoshi Oizumi; Hiroshi Isobe; Akihiko Gemma; Masao Harada; Hirohisa Yoshizawa; Ichiro Kinoshita; Yuka Fujita; Shoji Okinaga; Haruto Hirano; Kozo Yoshimori; Toshiyuki Harada; Takashi Ogura; Masahiro Ando; Hitoshi Miyazawa; Tomoaki Tanaka; Yasuo Saijo; Koichi Hagiwara; Satoshi Morita; Toshihiro Nukiwa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Personalizing cancer treatment in the age of global genomic analyses: PALB2 gene mutations and the response to DNA damaging agents in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Maria C Villarroel; N V Rajeshkumar; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Ana De Jesus-Acosta; Siân Jones; Anirban Maitra; Ralph H Hruban; James R Eshleman; Alison Klein; Daniel Laheru; Ross Donehower; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  TI-CE high-dose chemotherapy for patients with previously treated germ cell tumors: results and prognostic factor analysis.

Authors:  Darren R Feldman; Joel Sheinfeld; Dean F Bajorin; Patricia Fischer; Stefan Turkula; Nicole Ishill; Sujata Patil; Manjit Bains; Lilian M Reich; George J Bosl; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Diverse somatic mutation patterns and pathway alterations in human cancers.

Authors:  Zhengyan Kan; Bijay S Jaiswal; Jeremy Stinson; Vasantharajan Janakiraman; Deepali Bhatt; Howard M Stern; Peng Yue; Peter M Haverty; Richard Bourgon; Jianbiao Zheng; Martin Moorhead; Subhra Chaudhuri; Lynn P Tomsho; Brock A Peters; Kanan Pujara; Shaun Cordes; David P Davis; Victoria E H Carlton; Wenlin Yuan; Li Li; Weiru Wang; Charles Eigenbrot; Joshua S Kaminker; David A Eberhard; Paul Waring; Stephan C Schuster; Zora Modrusan; Zemin Zhang; David Stokoe; Frederic J de Sauvage; Malek Faham; Somasekar Seshagiri
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.

Authors:  Elizabeth Horstmann; Mary S McCabe; Louise Grochow; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Larry Rubinstein; Troy Budd; Dale Shoemaker; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Identifying optimal biologic doses of everolimus (RAD001) in patients with cancer based on the modeling of preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data.

Authors:  Chiaki Tanaka; Terence O'Reilly; John M Kovarik; Nicholas Shand; Katharine Hazell; Ian Judson; Eric Raymond; Sabine Zumstein-Mecker; Christine Stephan; Anne Boulay; Marc Hattenberger; George Thomas; Heidi A Lane
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael F Berger; Michael S Lawrence; Francesca Demichelis; Yotam Drier; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrey Y Sivachenko; Andrea Sboner; Raquel Esgueva; Dorothee Pflueger; Carrie Sougnez; Robert Onofrio; Scott L Carter; Kyung Park; Lukas Habegger; Lauren Ambrogio; Timothy Fennell; Melissa Parkin; Gordon Saksena; Douglas Voet; Alex H Ramos; Trevor J Pugh; Jane Wilkinson; Sheila Fisher; Wendy Winckler; Scott Mahan; Kristin Ardlie; Jennifer Baldwin; Jonathan W Simons; Naoki Kitabayashi; Theresa Y MacDonald; Philip W Kantoff; Lynda Chin; Stacey B Gabriel; Mark B Gerstein; Todd R Golub; Matthew Meyerson; Ashutosh Tewari; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz; Mark A Rubin; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Personalized and precision medicine: integrating genomics into treatment decisions in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Trang H Au; Kai Wang; David Stenehjem; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

2.  Aberrations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in 958 patients with diverse advanced tumors: implications for therapy.

Authors:  J J Wheler; G S Falchook; A M Tsimberidou; D S Hong; A Naing; S A Piha-Paul; S S Chen; S Fu; B Stephen; J Y Fok; F Janku; R Kurzrock
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Testing for oncogenic molecular aberrations in cell-free DNA-based liquid biopsies in the clinic: are we there yet?

Authors:  Jiri Polivka; Martin Pesta; Filip Janku
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.225

4.  Revisiting clinical trials using EGFR inhibitor-based regimens in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of an MD Anderson Cancer Center phase I population.

Authors:  Jennifer Wheler; Gerald Falchook; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David Hong; Aung Naing; Sarina Piha-Paul; Su S Chen; John Heymach; Siqing Fu; Bettzy Stephen; Jansina Y Fok; Filip Janku; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2013-05

5.  Feedback activation of AMPK-mediated autophagy acceleration is a key resistance mechanism against SCD1 inhibitor-induced cell growth inhibition.

Authors:  Akito Ono; Osamu Sano; Ken-Ichi Kazetani; Takamichi Muraki; Keisuke Imamura; Hiroyuki Sumi; Junji Matsui; Hidehisa Iwata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.