Literature DB >> 21802881

Noninvasive continuous or intermittent blood pressure and heart rate patient monitoring in the ED.

Richard M Nowak1, Ayan Sen, Audwin J Garcia, Heidi Wilkie, James J Yang, Michael R Nowak, Michele L Moyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Continuous invasive blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) monitoring in the emergency department (ED) is valuable in managing critically ill patients. Novel noninvasive finger cuff technology allows this same uninterrupted monitoring for almost any individual. This exploratory study compares ED noninvasive continuous to intermittent measurements of these variables.
METHODS: A variety of acutely ill ED patients (n = 40) with broad ranges of BP and HR underwent simultaneous monitoring using interval standard automated ED devices and continuous finger cuff technology (Nexfin; Bmeye, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) over a period of 2 hours. At baseline and at 15-minute intervals, simultaneous measurements for BP and HR were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: There were 25 men and 15 women enrolled with a mean age of 62.2 years (SD, 12.6). Eighteen had acute dyspnea, 11 with probable stroke syndrome, 3 with suspected sepsis, and 8 with a systolic BP greater than 180 or less than 100 mm Hg. Blood pressure and HR values (n = 344) simultaneously measured by automated ED equipment and the Nexfin finger cuff device were compared. The Pearson correlation coefficients were high, and the Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between the 2 determinations.
CONCLUSION: Continuous BP and HR monitoring measured by the Nexfin finger cuff device in this trial showed reasonable agreement when compared with the intermittent values obtained by automated ED equipment. However, theoretically, noninvasive and continuous monitoring of the BP and HR might better reflect underlying hemodynamics than these same measurements obtained intermittently and, thus, could be important in patient management. More study is needed to determine the optimal method of monitoring these parameters.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21802881     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  16 in total

1.  The T-Line TL-200 system for continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement in medical intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Florian Fassio; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Agnes S Meidert; Roland M Schmid; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Principles and pitfalls of arterial blood pressure measurement].

Authors:  A S Meidert; J Briegel; B Saugel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics: a comparative analysis of fingertip pulse contour analysis and impedance cardiography.

Authors:  Katherine A Sauder; Paige E Pokorney; Cindy E McCrea; Jan S Ulbrecht; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Sheila G West
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management.

Authors:  Guo Chen; Elena Chung; Lingzhong Meng; Brenton Alexander; Trung Vu; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Assessment of volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department: a systematic approach.

Authors:  C Maurer; J Y Wagner; R M Schmid; B Saugel
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 6.  Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Jasper Truijen; Johannes J van Lieshout; Wilbert A Wesselink; Berend E Westerhof
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Koen Ameloot; Katrijn Van De Vijver; Ole Broch; Niels Van Regenmortel; Inneke De Laet; Karen Schoonheydt; Hilde Dits; Berthold Bein; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-11

8.  Changing trends of hemodynamic monitoring in ICU - from invasive to non-invasive methods: Are we there yet?

Authors:  Shubhangi Arora; Preet Mohinder Singh; Basavana G Goudra; Ashish C Sinha
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-04

9.  The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challenge.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Fabien Picard; Elsa Lidzborski; Malcie Mesnil; Jacques Duranteau; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Noninvasive continuous versus intermittent arterial pressure monitoring: evaluation of the vascular unloading technique (CNAP device) in the emergency department.

Authors:  Julia Y Wagner; Julia S Prantner; Agnes S Meidert; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Roland M Schmid; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.