| Literature DB >> 21801415 |
Osbaldo Resendis-Antonio1, Magdalena Hernández, Emmanuel Salazar, Sandra Contreras, Gabriel Martínez Batallar, Yolanda Mora, Sergio Encarnación.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacterial nitrogen fixation is the biological process by which atmospheric nitrogen is uptaken by bacteroids located in plant root nodules and converted into ammonium through the enzymatic activity of nitrogenase. In practice, this biological process serves as a natural form of fertilization and its optimization has significant implications in sustainable agricultural programs. Currently, the advent of high-throughput technology supplies with valuable data that contribute to understanding the metabolic activity during bacterial nitrogen fixation. This undertaking is not trivial, and the development of computational methods useful in accomplishing an integrative, descriptive and predictive framework is a crucial issue to decoding the principles that regulated the metabolic activity of this biological process.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21801415 PMCID: PMC3164627 DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Syst Biol ISSN: 1752-0509
Figure 1Schematical view of data from high-throughput technology and constraint-based modeling. (A) Functional distribution of up regulated genes in bacteroids. (B) Functional categories of proteome data. (C) Number of up regulated genes and proteins-coding genes identified by transcriptomics and proteomics. Overlapping region represents the number of genes that were identified by both technologies. (D) Topological properties of the metabolic reconstruction for R.etli (iOR450). At the top from left to right: stoichiometric matrix and connectivity distribution (in log-log scale). At the bottom, metabolic pairs and its corresponding number of shared reactions (in log-log scale). (E) Figure in left side depicts the number of enzymes (genes) that were: 1) identified in silico but nor experimentally,(blue); 2) detected by both experimentally and in silico (green); and 3) experimentally detected but not observed in silico (red) along the 22 pathways listed in (F). Blue regions in right pies represent the overall percentage of genes and enzymes that simultaneously appear in silico and in high-throughput data. (F) A set of 22 metabolic pathways were used to assess the agreement between in silico and experimental results. Figure at left shows the activity of gluconeogenesis that emerged from the Flux Balance Analysis (FBA).
Figure 2Flux Variability Analysis (FVA). In panel (A) we depict the numerical participation of reactions with null variability along seven metabolic pathways included in the metabolic reconstruction. Reactions with null variability were defined as those whose upper and lower limit are equivalent. A fraction of reactions belonging to this classification are shown in (B). The set of reactions obtained by FVA are shown in (C). Here we have used the following abbreviations: PGM (phosphoglucomutase), FBA (fructose-bisphosphate aldolase), TPI (triose-phosphate isomerase), RPI (ribose-5-phosphate isomerase), PUNP1 (purine-nucleoside phosphorylase (Adenosine)), PUNP2 (purine-nucleoside phosphorylase (Deoxyadenosine)), PPCK(phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase), PHPB (acetoacetyl-CoA reductase), PHBS (PHB synthase), PGMT(phosphoglucomutase), PGI (glucose-6-phosphate isomerase), PDH (pyruvate dehydrogenase), PC (pyruvate carboxylase), NP1_r (nucleotide phosphatase), INSCR (inositol catabolic reactions (lumped)), INS2D (inositol 2-dehydrogenase), GUAPRTr (guanine phosphoribosyltransferase), GLGC (glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase), GLCS1 (glycogen synthase (ADPGlc)), GAPD(glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), G6PDH2(glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase), FBP (fructose-bisphosphatase), ENO (enolase), EDD (6-phosphogluconate dehydratase), EDA (2-dehydro-3-deoxy-phosphogluconate aldolase), CS (citrate synthase), ACONTa (aconitase (half-reaction A, Citrate hydro-lyase)), ACONTb (aconitase (half-reaction B, Isocitrate hydro-lyase)), NIT (nitrogenase), NH3t (ammonia reversible transport), NH3e (Ammonium dissociation, extracellular), N2tr (Nitrogen exchange, diffusion) and MMSAD3 (methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (malonic semialdehyde)).
Figure 3. Panel (A) summarizes the benchmarks used to evaluate the in silico description of nitrogen fixation. Black and blue letter in first column indicates the silenced enzyme its corresponding metabolic pathway respectively. Second column indicates the technology by which the enzymes were identified in this study. Third column indicates the Rhizobiacea used to compare in silico prediction. Forth and fifth columns represent the computational phenotype and the reference supporting the computational result. Sign (+), ( = ) and (-) respectively denotes an increment, invariance and decrement in nitrogen fixation when mutation were accomplished. The in silico phenotype effect carried out by aconitase hydratase (ACONTa), isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDHx), pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PPCK), biphosphate aldolase (FBA), nitrogenase (NIT) and CTP-synthase (CTPS2) are summarized in left side of panel B. The robustness analysis accomplished for inositol catabolic reaction (INSCT) is shown in panel B.