Literature DB >> 21800243

[How do patients choose a hospital for elective surgery?].

W de Cruppé1, M Geraedts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients want to decide on health care providers. Published quality reports are supposed to help but are rarely used. How patients manage choosing a hospital for elective surgery in Germany and whether they use the hospital quality reports was explored for the Federal Joint Committee.
METHOD: A cross-sectional survey asked 48 hospitalized patients from 5 specialties in 4 hospitals after elective surgery about their criteria and sources of information, and their use of the compulsory quality reports for choosing the hospital. Data were analyzed descriptively.
RESULTS: To choose their hospital is very important for patients with elective surgery and they do so. Usually there is enough time to obtain information before admission. The three main criteria are own experience with a hospital, short distance from their homes, and the hospital's expertise. The main sources of information are relatives, contact with the hospital's outpatient departments, and patient's ambulatory health care provider. Written information is only used as supplementary information. The compulsory quality reports are not known and, hence, are not used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21800243     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-011-1320-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  9 in total

1.  [Costs and benefits of quality management].

Authors:  I Schroeder-Printzen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The use of publicly available quality information when choosing a hospital or health-care provider: the role of the GP.

Authors:  Nora Doering; Hans Maarse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  [The potentials of patient surveys for quality assurance in medical care].

Authors:  Cordula Mühr; Frank Brunsmann; Martin Danner
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Achieving minimum caseload requirements: an analysis of hospital quality control reports from 2004-2010.

Authors:  Werner de Cruppé; Marc Malik; Max Geraedts
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Hospital choice in Germany from the patient's perspective: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Werner de Cruppé; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  [How do internal medicine patients choose their hospital? A cross-sectional study].

Authors:  W de Cruppé; M-C Kummer; M Geraedts
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 0.628

Review 7.  [Effects of statutory quality assurance in acute inpatient care].

Authors:  Max Geraedts; Werner de Cruppé
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Defining minimum volume thresholds to increase quality of care: a new patient-oriented approach using mixed integer programming.

Authors:  Justus F A Vogel; Max Barkhausen; Christoph M Pross; Alexander Geissler
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-01-28

9.  Mandatory quality reports in Germany from the hospitals' point of view: a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Silke Auras; Werner de Cruppé; Karl Blum; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.