Literature DB >> 35138421

[The potentials of patient surveys for quality assurance in medical care].

Cordula Mühr1, Frank Brunsmann2, Martin Danner3.   

Abstract

What constitutes "quality" in medical care and the means by which it is controlled, secured, or (re-)established has largely been assigned to the joint self-administration of service providers and health insurers in Germany. The current implementation uses an understanding of quality that does not sufficiently take into account important patient-centered quality dimensions. One of the reasons for this might be that patient surveys are not yet recognized as an equivalent data source for quality assessment in the German healthcare context and are not yet established nationwide. Where patient survey instruments are used, they are often reduced to the survey of so-called patient satisfaction. In the future, survey instruments must be viewed and used in a much more differentiated manner.Indication-specific patient surveys on treatment results (patient-reported outcome measures; PROMs) can provide information on the success of treatment in certain diseases. With the targeted collection of patient experiences (patient-reported experience measures; PREMs), the process quality can also be determined. The routine use of corresponding patient surveys is provided according to §§ 136 ff. and § 299 Social Security Code Book V (SGB V) for the purposes of legally binding external quality assurance. Their use is intended to support the alignment of the health system towards value and benefit for patients. To this extent, there is an urgent need for implementation and considerable further development.
© 2022. Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient satisfaction; Patient-centered quality dimensions; Patients; Quality; Survey tools

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35138421     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-022-03499-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  5 in total

Review 1.  A framework for assessing the performance of health systems.

Authors:  C J Murray; J Frenk
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  [Do physicians know and use mandatory quality reports?].

Authors:  P Hermeling; M Geraedts
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2012-08-03

3.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

4.  [How do patients choose a hospital for elective surgery?].

Authors:  W de Cruppé; M Geraedts
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance.

Authors:  K N Lohr
Journal:  J Qual Assur       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.