| Literature DB >> 19933770 |
Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez1, Carmen Moreno-Lorenzo, Guillermo A Matarán-Peñarrocha, Belen Feriche-Fernández-Castanys, Genoveva Granados-Gámez, José Manuel Quesada-Rubio.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of connective tissue massage to improve blood circulation and intermittent claudication symptoms in type 2 diabetic patients. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken. Ninety-eight type 2 diabetes patients with stage I or II-a peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (Leriche-Fontaine classification) were randomly assigned to a massage group or to a placebo group treated using disconnected magnetotherapy equipment. Peripheral arterial circulation was determined by measuring differential segmental arterial pressure, heart rate, skin temperature, oxygen saturation and skin blood flow. Measurements were taken before and at 30 min, 6 months and 1 year after the 15-week treatment. After the 15-week program, the groups differed (P < .05) in differential segmental arterial pressure in right lower limb (lower one-third of thigh, upper and lower one-third of leg) and left lower limb (lower one-third of thigh and upper and lower one-third of leg). A significant difference (P < .05) was also observed in skin blood flow in digits 1 and 4 of right foot and digits 2, 4 and 5 of left foot. ANOVA results were significant (P < .05) for right and left foot oxygen saturation but not for heart rate and temperature. At 6 months and 1 year, the groups differed in differential segmental arterial pressure in upper third of left and right legs. Connective tissue massage improves blood circulation in the lower limbs of type 2 diabetic patients at stage I or II-a and may be useful to slow the progression of PAD.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 19933770 PMCID: PMC3145465 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Differential segmental arterial blood pressure in lower limbs is the difference between systolic and diastolic arterial pressures in the segment under study. The wider the difference, the greater is the arterial blood flow.
Figure 2Voltage differential in skin blood flow is the difference between the voltage reached at systolic versus diastolic arterial peaks. The wider the voltage difference, the greater is the supply of arterial blood to the skin, as a consequence of vasodilation upper panel (a) shows a lower skin blood flow than that observed in lower panel (b).
Figure 3Flow chart of study participation None of the 98 randomized patients withdrew because of adverse events.
Figure 4P < .05 between intervention and placebo groups.
Differences between groups in differential segmental arterial pressure in lower limbs.
| Variable (mmHg) | Baseline |
|
30 min post-program |
| 6 months |
| 1 year |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IG | PG | IG | PG | IG | PG | IG | PG | |||||
| UTRT | 1.09 (0.44) | 1.17 (0.32) | .32 | 1.69 (0.83) | 1.21 (0.76) | .07 | 1.50 (0.49) | 1.24 (0.29) | .09 | 1.48 (0.33) | 1.19 (0.41) | .11 |
| LTRT | 1.49 (0.06) | 1.22 (0.12) | .10 | 2.09 (0.64) | 1.15 (0.51) | .03* | 1.87 (0.55) | 0.89 (0.83) | .04* | 1.56 (0.94) | 1.06 (0.36) | .07 |
| UTRL | 2.31 (0.97) | 1.79 (0.72) | .07 | 3.22 (1.15) | 1.88 (0.67) | .03* | 2.91 (1.05) | 1.87 (0.58) | .04* | 2.49 (0.61) | 1.86 (0.90) | .04* |
| LTRL | 0.90 (0.06) | 0.60 (0.97) | .99 | 1.21 (0.11) | 0.57 (0.06) | .05* | 1.18 (0.99) | 0.69 (0.64) | .08 | 1.03 (0.43) | 0.64 (0.96) | .09 |
| UTLT | 1.05 (0.34) | 1.12 (0.82) | .35 | 1.54 (0.47) | 1.09 (0.71) | .08 | 1.31 (0.58) | 1.11 (0.45) | .15 | 1.26 (0.23) | 1.08 (0.55) | .23 |
| LTLT | 1.39 (0.73) | 1.13 (0.79) | .10 | 1.62 (0.94) | 0.99 (1.01) | .05* | 1.54 (0.88) | 0.86 (0.72) | .05* | 1.41 (0.62) | 0.98 (0.34) | .08 |
| UTLL | 1.66 (2.57) | 1.32 (0.99) | .98 | 2.57 (1.08) | 1.33 (0.92) | .01* | 2.21 (0.83) | 1.35 (0.64) | .04* | 1.98 (0.51) | 1.29 (0.63) | .04* |
| LTLL | 0.89 (0.31) | 0.92 (0.87) | .67 | 1.12 (0.57) | 0.97 (0.56) | .18 | 1.07 (0.46) | 0.94 (0.38) | .25 | 0.99 (0.712) | 0.90 (0.57) | .36 |
Values are presented as mean (SD). RMG, reflex massage group; PG, placebo group; 1st PT, post-treatment (30 min after 15-week treatment ends); 2nd PT, 6 months post-treatment; 3rd PT, 1 year post-treatment; UTRT, upper third of right thigh; LTRT, lower third of right thigh; UTRL, upper third of right leg; LTRL, lower third of right leg; UTLT, upper third of left thigh; LTLT, lower third of left thigh; UTLL, upper third of left leg; LTLL, lower third of left leg.
*P < .05 was considered significant.
Differences between groups in differential voltage in skin blood flow.
| Variable (Digits) (mV/V) | Baseline |
|
30 min post-program |
| 6 months |
| 1 year |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IG | PG | IG | PG | IG | PG | IG | PG | |||||
| Right first | 2.19 (2.60) | 2.23 (4.23) | .35 | 3.10 (3.37) | 2.18 (3.89) | .03* | 3.04 (6.55) | 2.29 (5.60) | .04* | 2.59 (4.13) | 2.24 (4.97) | .06 |
| Right second | 3.10 (1.94) | 3.42 (2.35) | .07 | 3.93 (2.77) | 3.56 (2.27) | .06 | 3.41 (4.73) | 3.48 (2.11) | .30 | 3.21 (5.03) | 3.33 (3.01) | .27 |
| Right third | 2.63 (0.12) | 2.87 (1.45) | .10 | 2.96 (3.19) | 2.76 (2.03) | .14 | 2.24 (5.24) | 2.80 (1.63) | .05 | 2.38 (6.04) | 2.71 (1.98) | .08 |
| Right fourth | 4.73 (1.08) | 4.67 (2.13) | .29 | 6.50 (2.82) | 4.62 (1.99) | .01* | 5.73 (4.46) | 4.58 (4.32) | .03* | 5.02 (3.12) | 4.52 (3.12) | .05 |
| Right fifth | 5.57 (2.69) | 6.01 (2.56) | .06 | 6.30 (3.77) | 6.15 (3.11) | .08 | 6.59 (4.80) | 6.23 (2.88) | .06 | 6.01 (5.32) | 6.08 (2.97) | .29 |
| Left first | 3.84 (0.37) | 4.12 (1.35) | .07 | 4.17 (2.53) | 4.09 (1.41) | .31 | 4.55 (4.32) | 4.21 (1.57) | .08 | 4.11 (5.32) | 4.01 (1.22) | .22 |
| Left second | 5.20 (1.50) | 5.39 (3.78) | .16 | 6.27 (2.54) | 5.55 (3.88) | .04* | 6.12 (4.17) | 5.45 (3.92) | .04* | 5.88 (4.01) | 5.39 (3.61) | .05 |
| Left third | 4.06 (2.89) | 4.23 (2.57) | .21 | 4.44 (2.31) | 4.17 (2.78) | .09 | 4.52 (2.95) | 4.29 (2.65) | .09 | 4.48 (1.12) | 4.25 (2.82) | .10 |
| Left fourth | 4.88 (4.03) | 4.92 (4.99) | .35 | 5.36 (4.81) | 4.89 (4.83) | .05* | 5.44 (3.73) | 4.98 (5.32) | .04* | 5.24 (2.39) | 4.96 (5.05) | .09 |
| Left fifth | 4.72 (5.01) | 4.51 (4.57) | .12 | 6.58 (6.13) | 4.49 (4.68) | .01* | 5.04 (4.13) | 4.57 (4.08) | .04* | 4.69 (3.13) | 4.52 (4.14) | .13 |
Values are presented as mean (SD). RMG, reflex massage group; PG, placebo group; 1a PT, post-treatment (30 min after 15-week treatment ends); 2a PT, 6 months post-treatment; 3a PT, 1 year post-treatment).
*P < .05 was considered significant.
Figure 5Comparisons between study groups in levels of depression, anxiety and pain. *P < .05 (95% confidence interval). Values are presented as means.
Figure 6Comparisons between study groups in skin temperature and oxygen saturation. *P < .05 (95% confidence interval). Values are presented as means.
Figure 7Error bars in Walking Impairment Questionnaire. RMG, reflex massage groups, PG, placebo group. *P < .05.