| Literature DB >> 21799680 |
Sun Kwang Kim1, Jeungshin Kim, Eunjung Ko, Hyunseong Kim, Deok-Sang Hwang, Sanghoon Lee, Yonghyeon Baek, Byung-Il Min, Sangsoo Nam, Hyunsu Bae.
Abstract
Clinical evidence indicates that electroacupuncture (EA) is effective for allergic disorder. Recent animal studies have shown that EA treatment reduces levels of IgE and Th2 cytokines in BALB/c mice immunized with 2,4-dinitrophenylated keyhole limpet protein (DNP-KLH). The hypothalamus, a brain center of the neural-immune system, is known to be activated by EA stimulation. This study was performed to identify and characterize the differentially expressed genes in the hypothalamus of DNP-KLH immunized mice that were stimulated with EA or only restrained. To this aim, we conducted a microarray analysis to evaluate the global gene expression profiles, using the hypothalamic RNA samples taken from three groups of mice: (i) normal control group (no treatments); (ii) IMH group (DNP-KLH immunization + restraint); and (iii) IMEA group (immunization + EA stimulation). The microarray analysis revealed that total 39 genes were altered in their expression levels by EA treatment. Ten genes, including T-cell receptor alpha variable region family 13 subfamily 1 (Tcra-V13.1), heat shock protein 1B (Hspa1b) and 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase 1F (Oas1f), were up-regulated in the IMEA group when compared with the IMH group. In contrast, 29 genes, including decay accelerating factor 2 (Daf2), NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, quinone 1 (Nqo1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (Pdcd1lg2) were down-regulated in the IMEA group as compared with the IMH group. These results suggest that EA treatment can modulate immune response in DNP-KLH immunized mice by regulating expression levels of genes that are associated with innate immune, cellular defense and/or other kinds of immune system in the hypothalamus.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21799680 PMCID: PMC3136536 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Comparison of serum IgE levels in the three experimental groups. The amounts of serum IgE were measured by ELISA. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. **P < .01, ***P < .001 between the two indicated groups as determined by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test following one-way ANOVA. NC (n = 7, no treatments for 2 weeks, except for i.p. injection of saline on the 1st and 8th experimental day); IMH (n = 6, immunization on the 1st and 8th experimental day + daily holder restraint); IMEA (n = 6, immunization on the 1st and 8th experimental day + daily EA stimulation at the ST36 acupoint under holder restraint).
Alterations in gene expression in DNP-KLH immunized BALB/c mice that were treated with EA stimulation.
| Genes | Symbol | Regulation profile and average fold change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NC versus Hold | Hold versus EA | ||
| <Cluster 3> | |||
| T-cell receptor alpha variable region family 13 subfamily 1 | Tcra-V13.1 | −0.35 | 0.88 |
| Limb expression 1 homolog (chicken) | Lix1 | −0.11 | 0.3 |
| Trefoil factor 2 (spasmolytic protein 1) | Tff2 | −0.12 | 0.31 |
| Heat shock protein 1B | Hspa1b | −0.08 | 0.38 |
| Olfactory receptor 1436 | Olfr1436 | −0.23 | 0.55 |
| Olfactory receptor 1475 | Olfr1475 | −0.43 | 1.15 |
| 2′–5′ oligoadenylate synthetase 1F | Oas1f | −0.23 | 0.34 |
| Olfactory receptor 689 | Olfr689 | −0.13 | 0.35 |
| Olfactory receptor 26 | Olfr26 | −0.10 | 0.39 |
| Probasin | Pbsn | −0.44 | 0.80 |
| <Cluster 5> | |||
| Dermatopontin | Dpt | 0.15 | −0.29 |
| Decay accelerating factor 2 | Daf2 | 0.17 | −0.30 |
| Anterior gradient homolog 3 (Xenopus laevis) | Agr3 | 0.13 | −0.35 |
| Secretagogin, EF-hand calcium binding protein | Scgn | 0.36 | −0.35 |
| 3-oxoacyl-ACP synthase, mitochondrial | Oxsm | 0.22 | −0.32 |
| Empty spiracles homolog 2 (Drosophila) | Emx2 | 0.48 | −0.45 |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member B1 | Aldh3b1 | 0.22 | −0.38 |
| Cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily c, polypeptide 38 | Cyp2c38 | 0.27 | −0.79 |
| Sulfide quinone reductase-like (yeast) | Sqrdl | 0.20 | −0.28 |
| Olfactory receptor 1231 | Olfr1231 | 0.27 | −0.35 |
| Myosin light chain 2, precursor lymphocyte-specific | Mylc2pl | 0.13 | −0.26 |
| NLR family, pyrin domain containing 4E | Nlrp4e | 2.32 | −3.96 |
| Olfactory receptor 617 | Olfr617 | 0.21 | −0.37 |
| Olfactory receptor 544 | Olfr544 | 0.29 | −0.37 |
| Carboxylesterase 2 | Ces2 | 0.09 | −0.28 |
| NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, quinone 1 | Nqo1 | 0.17 | −0.28 |
| Sodium channel, voltage-gated, type X, alpha | Scn10a | 0.17 | −0.45 |
| <Cluster 6> | |||
| Olfactory receptor 1393 | Olfr1393 | −0.1 | −0.47 |
| Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 1 | Igf2bp1 | 0.05 | −0.29 |
| Cathepsin 3 | Cts3 | 0.06 | −0.39 |
| Olfactory receptor 720 | Olfr720 | −0.19 | −0.27 |
| Cell division cycle 25 homolog C (S. pombe) | Cdc25c | 0.05 | −0.27 |
| Programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 | Pdcd1lg2 | 0.05 | −0.34 |
| Olfactory receptor 1310 | Olfr1310 | 0.03 | −0.55 |
| Group specific component | Gc | −0.02 | −0.32 |
| G protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member D | Gprc5d | −0.07 | −0.37 |
| Serum amyloid A 4 | Saa4 | −0.51 | −0.53 |
| Vomeronasal 2, receptor 65 | Vmn2r65 | 0.05 | −0.53 |
| Intestine specific homeobox | Isx | 0.05 | −0.29 |
Categorized pathways based on comparison of gene expression between IMH and IMEA groups.
| KEGG Pathway | Gene counts |
|
|---|---|---|
| Metabolism of xenobiotics by | 2 | 5.06 |
| Fatty acid biosynthesis | 1 | 1.18 |
| Biosynthesis of steroids | 1 | 3.87 |
| Phenylalanine metabolism | 1 | 5.22 |
| Histidine metabolism | 1 | 5.89 |
| Cell cycle | 1 | 5.95 |
| Neuroactive ligand- | 1 | 7.11 |
| Linoleic acid metabolism | 1 | 7.23 |
| Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) | 1 | 7.69 |
| Tyrosine metabolism | 1 | 8.74 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 1 | 1.13 |
| Complement and coagulation cascades | 1 | 1.18 |
| Hematopoietic cell lineage | 1 | 1.34 |
| Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis | 1 | 1.38 |
| Leukocyte transendothelial migration | 1 | 1.79 |
| Tight junction | 1 | 2.17 |
| Focal adhesion | 1 | 3.25 |
| Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 1 | 3.36 |
Figure 2Clustergram of up- and down-regulated genes in DNP-KLH immunized BALB/c mice that were subjected to EA stimulation. The results shown are representative of three independent samples collected for each treatment. Each gene is represented by a single row of clustered boxes and each experimental sample is represented by a single column. The entire clustered image is shown on the left. The signal averages of up- and down-regulated genes are shown on the right.
Figure 3Gene ontology assignment of DEGs. Bars on Cluster 3 indicate up-regulated genes and bars on Cluster 5 and Cluster 6 indicate down-regulated genes comparing IMEA with IMH.
Figure 4Summary of the mechanisms underlying EA-induced regulation of gene expression in the hypothalamus for anti-allergic effects.