Literature DB >> 21799087

MRI measurement of bone marrow cellularity for radiation dosimetry.

Jose C Pichardo1, Rowan J Milner, Wesley E Bolch.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The current gold standard for measuring marrow cellularity is the bone marrow (BM) biopsy of the iliac crest. This measure is not predictive of total marrow cellularity, because the biopsy volume is typically small and fat fraction varies across the skeleton. MRI and localized MR spectroscopy have been demonstrated as noninvasive means for measuring BM cellularity in patients. The accuracy of these methods has been well established in phantom studies and in the determination of in vivo hepatic fat fractions but not for in vivo measurement of BM cellularity.
METHODS: Spoiled gradient-echo in vivo images of the femur, humerus, upper spine, and lower spine were acquired for 2 dogs using a clinical 3-T MRI scanner. Single-peak iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares (SP-IDEAL) was used to derive BM fat fractions. Stimulated-echo acquisition mode spectra were acquired in order to perform multipeak IDEAL with precalibration (MP-IDEAL). In vivo accuracy was validated by comparison with histology measurements. Histologic fat fractions were derived from adipocyte segmentation.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman plots demonstrated excellent agreement between SP-IDEAL and histology, with a mean difference of -0.52% cellularity and most differences within ±2% cellularity, but agreement between MP-IDEAL and histology was not as good (mean difference, -7% cellularity, and differences between 5% and -20%).
CONCLUSION: Adipocyte segmentation of histology slides provides a measure of volumetric fat fraction (i.e., adipocyte volume fraction [AVF]) and not chemical fat fraction, because fat fraction measured from histology is invariant to the relative abundances of lipid chemical species. In contrast, MP-IDEAL provides a measure of chemical fat fraction, thus explaining the poor agreement of this method with histology. SP-IDEAL measures the relative abundance of methylene lipids, and this measure is shown to be equivalent to AVF. AVF provides the appropriate parameter to account for patient-specific cellularity in BM mass predictive equations and is consistent with current micro-CT-based models of skeletal dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799087     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.087957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  11 in total

1.  Bone marrow fat quantification in the presence of trabecular bone: initial comparison between water-fat imaging and single-voxel MRS.

Authors:  Dimitrios C Karampinos; Gerd Melkus; Thomas Baum; Jan S Bauer; Ernst J Rummeny; Roland Krug
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Influence of calcium on choline measurements by 1H MR spectroscopy of thigh muscles.

Authors:  Pedro A Gondim Teixeira; Gabriela Hossu; François Kauffmann; Anou Sewonu; Jean-Marc Constans; Alain Blum; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of dual energy quantitative CT for determining the spatial distributions of red marrow and bone for dosimetry in internal emitter radiation therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell M Goodsitt; Apeksha Shenoy; Jincheng Shen; David Howard; Matthew J Schipper; Scott Wilderman; Emmanuel Christodoulou; Se Young Chun; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Validation of bone marrow fat quantification in the presence of trabecular bone using MRI.

Authors:  Christina S Gee; Jennifer T K Nguyen; Candice J Marquez; Julia Heunis; Andrew Lai; Cory Wyatt; Misung Han; Galateia Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Roland Krug
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Bone marrow fat is increased in chronic kidney disease by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  R N Moorthi; W Fadel; G J Eckert; K Ponsler-Sipes; S M Moe; C Lin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Water-fat MRI for assessing changes in bone marrow composition due to radiation and chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer patients.

Authors:  Patrick J Bolan; Luke Arentsen; Thanasak Sueblinvong; Yan Zhang; Steen Moeller; Jori S Carter; Levi S Downs; Rahel Ghebre; Douglas Yee; Jerry Froelich; Susanta Hui
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Measurement of vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in children using quantitative water-fat MRI.

Authors:  Stefan Ruschke; Amber Pokorney; Thomas Baum; Holger Eggers; Jeffrey H Miller; Houchun H Hu; Dimitrios C Karampinos
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue Quantification by Imaging.

Authors:  Ebrahim Bani Hassan; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Mahdi Imani; Numan Kutaiba; David K Wright; Tara Sepehrizadeh; Gustavo Duque
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Investigation of effect of variations in bone fraction and red marrow cellularity on bone marrow dosimetry in radio-immunotherapy.

Authors:  S J Wilderman; P L Roberson; W E Bolch; Y K Dewaraja
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Quantitative MRI and spectroscopy of bone marrow.

Authors:  Dimitrios C Karampinos; Stefan Ruschke; Michael Dieckmeyer; Maximilian Diefenbach; Daniela Franz; Alexandra S Gersing; Roland Krug; Thomas Baum
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.