Literature DB >> 21798508

The obesity paradox and weight loss.

Jonathan Myers1, Kusum Lata, Shilpy Chowdhury, Paul McAuley, Nikhil Jain, Victor Froelicher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An "obesity paradox," in which overweight and obese individuals with established cardiovascular disease have a better prognosis than normal weight subjects, has been reported in a number of clinical cohorts, but little is known about the effects of weight loss on the obesity paradox and its association with health outcomes.
METHODS: Weight was determined in 3834 men at the time of a clinically referred exercise test and again during a clinical evaluation a mean of 7 years later. The associations among weight changes, baseline fitness, and other risk markers with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 314 subjects died (72 of cardiovascular causes). In a multivariate analysis (including baseline weight, weight change, exercise capacity, and cardiovascular disease), weight gain was associated with lower mortality and weight loss was associated with higher mortality (4% higher per pound lost per year, P<.001) compared with stable weight. For all-cause mortality, the relative risks for the no change, weight gain, and weight loss groups were 1.0 (referent), 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.83), and 1.49 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.89), respectively (P<.001). Those who died and exhibited weight loss had a significantly higher prevalence of deaths due to cancer and cardiovascular causes.
CONCLUSION: Weight loss was related to higher mortality and weight gain was related to lower mortality when compared with stable weight. The obesity paradox in our sample is explained in part by a combination of non-volitional weight loss related to occult disease and a protective effect of weight gain. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21798508     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  24 in total

Review 1.  Selection bias in rheumatic disease research.

Authors:  Hyon K Choi; Uyen-Sa Nguyen; Jingbo Niu; Goodarz Danaei; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  The obesity paradox in chronic heart failure: what does it mean?

Authors:  Paul J Chase; Paul G Davis; Daniel R Bensimhon
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

3.  The obesity paradox, cardiorespiratory fitness, and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Paul A McAuley; Enrique G Artero; Xuemei Sui; Duck-chul Lee; Timothy S Church; Carl J Lavie; Jonathan N Myers; Vanesa España-Romero; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  The obesity paradox: is it really a paradox? Hypertension.

Authors:  Alessandro Lechi
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Physical activity, obesity, weight change, and risk of atrial fibrillation: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.

Authors:  Rachel R Huxley; Jeffrey R Misialek; Sunil K Agarwal; Laura R Loehr; Elsayed Z Soliman; Lin Y Chen; Alvaro Alonso
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-06

6.  Obesity Paradox in Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Molecular Insights.

Authors:  Emilio Rodríguez-Castro; Manuel Rodríguez-Yáñez; Susana Arias-Rivas; María Santamaría-Cadavid; Iria López-Dequidt; Pablo Hervella; Miguel López; Francisco Campos; Tomás Sobrino; José Castillo
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 6.829

7.  Weight change and survival after breast cancer in the after breast cancer pooling project.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Marilyn L Kwan; Xiao Ou Shu; John P Pierce; Ruth E Patterson; Sarah J Nechuta; Elizabeth M Poole; Candyce H Kroenke; Erin K Weltzien; Shirley W Flatt; Charles P Quesenberry; Michelle D Holmes; Wendy Y Chen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  'Obesity paradox' misunderstands the biology of optimal weight throughout the life cycle.

Authors:  J B Dixon; G J Egger; E A Finkelstein; J G Kral; G W Lambert
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 9.  The prognostic importance of weight loss in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Quinn R Pack; Juan Pablo Rodriguez-Escudero; Randal J Thomas; Philip A Ades; Colin P West; Virend K Somers; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Abnormal Exercise Test or CVD History on Weight Loss or Fitness: the Look AHEAD Trial.

Authors:  John M Jakicic; Edward S Horton; Jeffrey M Curtis; Tina M Killean; George A Bray; Lawrence J Cheskin; Karen C Johnson; Roeland J W Middelbeek; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Judith G Regensteiner; Paul M Ribisl; Lynne Wagenknecht; Mark A Espeland
Journal:  Transl J Am Coll Sports Med       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.