PURPOSE: Obesity and type 2 diabetes are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the combination of weight loss and increased physical exercise are commonly recommended to reduce CVD. This study examined whether people with obesity and type 2 diabetes with an abnormal graded exercise tolerance test (GXT) or a history of CVD would have less success in achieving weight loss and improved fitness, compared to adults without these conditions. METHODS: The Look AHEAD Study examined whether an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) compared with diabetes support and education (DSE) reduced cardiovascular events in adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. Participants underwent a baseline maximal GXT and provided medical history data. Weight loss and fitness change were examined in 5011 participants over four years in those with or without an abnormal baseline GXT and/or history of CVD. RESULTS: After four years, weight loss in both ILI and DSE were significantly greater in those without a prior history of CVD than in those with a CVD history (6.69% vs 5.98%, p=0.02, in ILI and 0.73 vs -.07% (weight gain), p=0.01, in DSE). Likewise, those without a prior history of CVD experienced greater improvements in fitness in both ILI and DSE relative to those with a history of CVD. Having an abnormal GXT at baseline did not affect weight loss or fitness. CONCLUSIONS: A history of CVD at baseline modestly lessened weight loss and fitness changes at 4 years, whereas having any abnormality on the baseline GXT did not affect these outcomes. Thus, weight loss and improved fitness are achievable in adults with a history of CVD or ECG abnormalities.
PURPOSE: Obesity and type 2 diabetes are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the combination of weight loss and increased physical exercise are commonly recommended to reduce CVD. This study examined whether people with obesity and type 2 diabetes with an abnormal graded exercise tolerance test (GXT) or a history of CVD would have less success in achieving weight loss and improved fitness, compared to adults without these conditions. METHODS: The Look AHEAD Study examined whether an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) compared with diabetes support and education (DSE) reduced cardiovascular events in adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. Participants underwent a baseline maximal GXT and provided medical history data. Weight loss and fitness change were examined in 5011 participants over four years in those with or without an abnormal baseline GXT and/or history of CVD. RESULTS: After four years, weight loss in both ILI and DSE were significantly greater in those without a prior history of CVD than in those with a CVD history (6.69% vs 5.98%, p=0.02, in ILI and 0.73 vs -.07% (weight gain), p=0.01, in DSE). Likewise, those without a prior history of CVD experienced greater improvements in fitness in both ILI and DSE relative to those with a history of CVD. Having an abnormal GXT at baseline did not affect weight loss or fitness. CONCLUSIONS: A history of CVD at baseline modestly lessened weight loss and fitness changes at 4 years, whereas having any abnormality on the baseline GXT did not affect these outcomes. Thus, weight loss and improved fitness are achievable in adults with a history of CVD or ECG abnormalities.
Entities:
Keywords:
cardiorespiratory fitness; cardiovascular disease; diabetes; electrocardiography; obesity; weight loss
Authors: S C Smith; S N Blair; R O Bonow; L M Brass; M D Cerqueira; K Dracup; V Fuster; A Gotto; S M Grundy; N H Miller; A Jacobs; D Jones; R M Krauss; L Mosca; I Ockene; R C Pasternak; T Pearson; M A Pfeffer; R D Starke; K A Taubert Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert H Eckel; John M Jakicic; Jamy D Ard; Janet M de Jesus; Nancy Houston Miller; Van S Hubbard; I-Min Lee; Alice H Lichtenstein; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; Frank M Sacks; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Thomas A Wadden; Susan Z Yanovski; Karima A Kendall; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; George Velasco; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Peter Kokkinos; Charles Faselis; Jonathan Myers; Xuemei Sui; Jiajia Zhang; Steven N Blair Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Delia Smith West; Linda Delahanty; John Jakicic; Jack Rejeski; Don Williamson; Robert I Berkowitz; David E Kelley; Christine Tomchee; James O Hill; Shiriki Kumanyika Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Rebecca H Neiberg; Rena R Wing; Jeanne M Clark; Linda M Delahanty; James O Hill; Jonathan Krakoff; Amy Otto; Donna H Ryan; Mara Z Vitolins Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Donna H Ryan; Mark A Espeland; Gary D Foster; Steven M Haffner; Van S Hubbard; Karen C Johnson; Steven E Kahn; William C Knowler; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2003-10
Authors: Fredric D Wolinsky; Elena M Andresen; Theodore K Malmstrom; Mario Schootman; J Philip Miller; Douglas K Miller Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2009-03
Authors: Xavier Pi-Sunyer; George Blackburn; Frederick L Brancati; George A Bray; Renee Bright; Jeanne M Clark; Jeffrey M Curtis; Mark A Espeland; John P Foreyt; Kathryn Graves; Steven M Haffner; Barbara Harrison; James O Hill; Edward S Horton; John Jakicic; Robert W Jeffery; Karen C Johnson; Steven Kahn; David E Kelley; Abbas E Kitabchi; William C Knowler; Cora E Lewis; Barbara J Maschak-Carey; Brenda Montgomery; David M Nathan; Jennifer Patricio; Anne Peters; J Bruce Redmon; Rebecca S Reeves; Donna H Ryan; Monika Safford; Brent Van Dorsten; Thomas A Wadden; Lynne Wagenknecht; Jacqueline Wesche-Thobaben; Rena R Wing; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 19.112