Literature DB >> 21798211

Using DNA barcoding and phylogenetics to identify Antarctic invertebrate larvae: Lessons from a large scale study.

Dorothea Heimeier, Shane Lavery, Mary A Sewell.   

Abstract

Ecological studies of the diversity and distribution of marine planktonic larvae are increasingly depending on molecular methods for accurate taxonomic identification. The greater coverage of reference marine species on genetic databases such as GenBank and BoLD (Barcoding of Life Data Systems; www.boldystems.org); together with the decreasing costs for DNA sequencing have made large scale larval identification studies using molecular methods more feasible. Here, we present the development and implementation of a practical molecular approach to identify over 2000 individual marine invertebrate larvae that were collected in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, during the austral summer over five years (2002-2007) as part of the LGP (Latitudinal Gradient Project). Larvae for molecular ID were morphologically identified to belong to the Phyla Mollusca, Echinodermata, Nemertea and Annelida (Class Polychaeta), but also included unidentified early developmental stages which could not be assigned a specific taxon (e.g., eggs, blastulae). The use of a 100μm mesh plankton net makes this one of the first larval identification studies to simultaneously consider both embryos and larvae. Molecular identification methods included amplification of up to three molecular loci for each specimen, a pre-identification step using BLAST with GenBank, phylogenetic reconstructions and cross-validation of assigned Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs). This combined approach of morphological and molecular methods assigned about 700 individuals to 53 MOTUs, which were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level. During the course of this long-term study we identified several procedural difficulties, including issues with the collection of larvae, locus amplification, contamination, assignment and validation of MOTUs. The practical guidelines that we describe here should greatly assist other researchers to conduct reliable molecular identification studies of larvae in the future.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Year:  2010        PMID: 21798211     DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2010.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Genomics        ISSN: 1874-7787            Impact factor:   1.710


  8 in total

1.  Origin, diversity, and biogeography of Antarctic scale worms (Polychaeta: Polynoidae): a wide-scale barcoding approach.

Authors:  Dominique A Cowart; Stefano Schiaparelli; Maria Chiara Alvaro; Matteo Cecchetto; Anne-Sophie Le Port; Didier Jollivet; Stephane Hourdez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Application of Dual Metabarcoding Platforms for the Meso- and Macrozooplankton Taxa in the Ross Sea.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; Hyoung Sul La; Jeong-Hoon Kim; Wuju Son; Hyun Park; Young-Mog Kim; Hyun-Woo Kim
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  Conveniently pre-tagged and pre-packaged: extended molecular identification and metagenomics using complete metazoan mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Agnes Dettai; Cyril Gallut; Sophie Brouillet; Joel Pothier; Guillaume Lecointre; Régis Debruyne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  DNA barcoding of marine copepods: assessment of analytical approaches to species identification.

Authors:  Leocadio Blanco-Bercial; Astrid Cornils; Nancy Copley; Ann Bucklin
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2014-06-23

5.  DNA barcoding uncovers cryptic diversity in 50% of deep-sea Antarctic polychaetes.

Authors:  Madeleine J Brasier; Helena Wiklund; Lenka Neal; Rachel Jeffreys; Katrin Linse; Henry Ruhl; Adrian G Glover
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia.

Authors:  Fitri Y Amandita; Katja Rembold; Barbara Vornam; Sri Rahayu; Iskandar Z Siregar; Holger Kreft; Reiner Finkeldey
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Multi-locus DNA metabarcoding of zooplankton communities and scat reveal trophic interactions of a generalist predator.

Authors:  E L Carroll; R Gallego; M A Sewell; J Zeldis; L Ranjard; H A Ross; L K Tooman; R O'Rorke; R D Newcomb; R Constantine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Next generation sequencing reveals the hidden diversity of zooplankton assemblages.

Authors:  Penelope K Lindeque; Helen E Parry; Rachel A Harmer; Paul J Somerfield; Angus Atkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.