| Literature DB >> 35866013 |
Dominique A Cowart1,2, Stefano Schiaparelli3,4, Maria Chiara Alvaro3, Matteo Cecchetto3,4, Anne-Sophie Le Port5, Didier Jollivet5, Stephane Hourdez5,6.
Abstract
The Antarctic marine environment hosts diversified and highly endemic benthos owing to its unique geologic and climatic history. Current warming trends have increased the urgency of understanding Antarctic species history to predict how environmental changes will impact ecosystem functioning. Antarctic benthic lineages have traditionally been examined under three hypotheses: (1) high endemism and local radiation, (2) emergence of deep-sea taxa through thermohaline circulation, and (3) species migrations across the Polar Front. In this study, we investigated which hypotheses best describe benthic invertebrate origins by examining Antarctic scale worms (Polynoidae). We amassed 691 polynoid sequences from the Southern Ocean and neighboring areas: the Kerguelen and Tierra del Fuego (South America) archipelagos, the Indian Ocean, and waters around New Zealand. We performed phylogenetic reconstructions to identify lineages across geographic regions, aided by mitochondrial markers cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (Cox1) and 16S ribosomal RNA (16S). Additionally, we produced haplotype networks at the species scale to examine genetic diversity, biogeographic separations, and past demography. The Cox1 dataset provided the most illuminating insights into the evolution of polynoids, with a total of 36 lineages identified. Eunoe sp. was present at Tierra del Fuego and Kerguelen, in favor of the latter acting as a migration crossroads. Harmothoe fuligineum, widespread around the Antarctic continent, was also present but isolated at Kerguelen, possibly resulting from historical freeze-thaw cycles. The genus Polyeunoa appears to have diversified prior to colonizing the continent, leading to the co-occurrence of at least three cryptic species around the Southern and Indian Oceans. Analyses identified that nearly all populations are presently expanding following a bottleneck event, possibly caused by habitat reduction from the last glacial episodes. Findings support multiple origins for contemporary Antarctic polynoids, and some species investigated here provide information on ancestral scenarios of (re)colonization. First, it is apparent that species collected from the Antarctic continent are endemic, as the absence of closely related species in the Kerguelen and Tierra del Fuego datasets for most lineages argues in favor of Hypothesis 1 of local origin. Next, Eunoe sp. and H. fuligineum, however, support the possibility of Kerguelen and other sub-Antarctic islands acting as a crossroads for larvae of some species, in support of Hypothesis 3. Finally, the genus Polyeunoa, conversely, is found at depths greater than 150 m and may have a deep origin, in line with Hypothesis 2. These "non endemic" groups, nevertheless, have a distribution that is either north or south of the Antarctic Polar Front, indicating that there is still a barrier to dispersal, even in the deep sea.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctic biogeography; DNA barcoding; Southern Ocean; benthic invertebrate; gene flow; polynoid; species connectivity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35866013 PMCID: PMC9288932 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 3.167
FIGURE 1An image of the species Eulagisca uschakovi (Annelida, Polynoidae), near the Dumont d'Urville Station, Antarctica, taken at 30 m. The individual's approximate length is 25 cm. Copyright Pierre Chevaldonné
FIGURE 2Locations from where polynoid individuals were collected that also includes locations for taxa whose sequences were previously published and used in this study (see Table A2). The center of minimum distance between the South Indian Ocean sites (n = 4, Serpetti et al., 2017) was calculated (http://www.geomidpoint.com/); this distance was identified as being located approximately 2050 km north of the Kerguelen archipelago, for reference. This map was produced with the aid of QGIS and the Quantarctica3 mapping environment (Matsuoka et al., 2021)
FIGURE 3Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (Cox1) PhyML tree of polynoids based on a 658‐bp alignment of 557 sequences. Listed next to the tree are the three main geographic areas, under which are the numbers of sequences for each lineage. All lineages are exclusively found at a single geographic area, except for H. fuligineum and the taxon determined as Eunoe sp. (arrows). Posterior probability values for the nodes are provided for all terminal clusters. Species names have been emphasized for only those taxa that had enough sequences (n > 30) for haplotype network investigations
Locations, number of sequences, Fst and pairwise Fst values for Barrukia cristata, Harmothoe crosetensis, Harmothoe fuligineum and Polyeunoa laevis clusters 1 and 3, as cluster 2 had too few sequences for performing these analyses. Harmothoe magellanica is not shown given that it represents a local Kerguelen species. Alignment lengths were all 658‐bp. The Hudson et al. (1992) Fst values for each species are located under the species' name. The number of sequences for each species by region is identified within a separate column, while pairwise Fst values are reported in adjacent columns. (*) indicates significance at p < .05
| Number of sequences | Antarctic peninsula | Ross Sea | Adélie land | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fst = 0.01789 | 66 | |||
| Antarctic Peninsula | 5 | — | ||
| Ross Sea | 19 | −0.00606 | — | |
| Adélie Land | 42 | 0.07394 | −0.01300 | — |
|
Fst = 0.02272 | 77 | |||
| Antarctic Peninsula | 5 | — | ||
| Ross Sea | 27 | 0.03483 | — | |
| Adélie Land | 45 | 0.02882 | 0.00161 | — |
|
Fst = 0.00470* | 163 | |||
| Antarctic Peninsula | 19 | — | ||
| Ross Sea | 38 | 0.00146 | — | |
| Adélie Land | 106 | 0.00415 | 0.00999 | — |
|
Fst = −0.01020 | 78 | |||
| Antarctic Peninsula | 5 | — | ||
| Ross Sea | 59 | 0.02631 | — | |
| Adélie Land | 14 | 0.00000 | 0.00432 | — |
|
Fst = 0.01813 | 109 | |||
| Antarctic Peninsula | 38 | — | ||
| Ross Sea | 37 | 0.02001 | — | |
| Amundsen | 34 | 0.00759 | 0.04276 | — |
FIGURE 4Haplotype networks based on Cox1 sequences for (a) Barrukia cristata (n = 66) and (b) Harmothoe crosetensis (n = 77)
FIGURE 5Haplotype network based on Cox1 sequences for Harmothoe fuligineum (n = 164)
FIGURE 6Haplotype network based on Cox1 sequences for Polyeunoa laevis (n = 274). The closely related species Parapolyeunoa flynni is included for reference. For each cluster, the colored stickers below the name summarize the regions of the sequences present in the cluster
Nucleotide diversity of five species investigated using haplotype networks. P. laevis is subdivided into its three major clusters illustrated in Figure 6; cluster 1: Adèlie land/Peninsula/Ross Sea/Amundsen Sea, cluster 2: Kerguelen/Indian Ocean/Argentina, cluster 3: Peninsula/Ross Sea/ Amundsen Sea. Cluster 4 is not included given its low number of sequences
| Species | Ns | Nh | Hd | π | Tajima's D | Fu & li′s D | Expansion test Δχ2 df | Tau | Calculated age (kya) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 66 | 20 | 0.765 | 0.00302 | −1.93459* | −3.26372* | 969.9 19 *** | 1.38 | 59.0 |
|
| 77 | 60 | 0.987 | 0.00910 | −1.94267* | −3.69112** | 4394 22 *** | 4.48 | 191.4 |
|
| 106 | 28 | 0.797 | 0.00270 | −2.10538* | −3.57024** | 3396.2 19*** | 1.52 | 65.0 |
|
| 19 | 9 | 0.866 | 0.00560 | −1.62137NS | −1.71020NS | 25.7 25 NS | (1.26) | (53.8) |
|
| 38 | 17 | 0.829 | 0.00334 | −1.94000* | −3.64615** | 671.7 19 *** | 1.83 | 78.2 |
|
| 33 | 17 | 0.877 | 0.00653 | −0.84029NS | −1.76988 NS | 5936.1 19 *** | 1.10 | 47.0 |
|
| 79 | 45 | 0.918 | 0.00595 | −2.22592*** | −4.09878 ** | 3972 19 *** | 2.92 | 124.8 |
|
| 25 | 15 | 0.940 | 0.00752 | −0.63838 NS | −0.10357 NS | 364.98 20 *** | 2.54 | 108.5 |
|
| 114 | 77 | 0.981 | 0.01022 | −2.00242* | −4.7969 ** | 9257 22 *** | 5.01 | 214.1 |
Abbreviations: df, degrees of freedom; Hd: Haplotype diversity; Nh: Number of haplotypes; Ns: Number of sequences; Δχ2: difference of distribution of observed pairwise distances compared with a constant site population and an expanding population; π: Nucleotide diversity.
This identifies the value as only indicative, as expansion is not demonstrated.
Statistical significance level: * < 0.05, ** <0.02, *** <0.001, NS = not significant.