Literature DB >> 21796496

The interim test effect: testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material.

Kathryn T Wissman1, Katherine A Rawson, Mary A Pyc.   

Abstract

A wealth of prior research has shown that testing can improve subsequent learning of the initially tested material. In contrast, only one recent study has shown that an interim test over prior material can improve learning of subsequent new material (i.e., an interim-test effect). Five experiments replicated and extended this initial work by exploring the extent to which interim test effects generalize to complex text material. Participants were prompted to recall each section of an expository text before moving on to study the next section, or were only prompted to recall after the final section. In all experiments, recall of the final, target section was greater when prior sections had received interim tests versus no interim tests. Experiment 3 established that the effect was due to interim testing in particular rather than to intervening activity in general. Experiment 4 established that the effect was not due to test expectancy differences. In contrast to prior research, Experiment 4 also provided evidence that the effect is not due to release from proactive interference. We discuss other possible mechanisms underlying interim-test effects with text, including shifting to more effective encoding strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21796496     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0140-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

Review 1.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Andrew C Butler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis.

Authors:  Mary A Pyc; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan; Kathleen B McDermott; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-11

4.  The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference.

Authors:  Karl K Szpunar; Kathleen B McDermott; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2009-12-01

7.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

8.  The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

9.  Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan; Ayanna K Thomas; John B Bulevich
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11-25
  9 in total
  18 in total

1.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Phillip J Grimaldi; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Kalif E Vaughn; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05

3.  Testing enhances motor practice.

Authors:  Tobias Tempel; Christian Frings
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

4.  Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures.

Authors:  Karl K Szpunar; Novall Y Khan; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

6.  Individual differences in task-specific paired associates learning in older adults: the role of processing speed and working memory.

Authors:  Tanja Kurtz; Jacqueline Mogle; Martin J Sliwinski; Scott M Hofer
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.645

7.  Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.

Authors:  Michael S Cohen; Jesse Rissman; Mariam Hovhannisyan; Alan D Castel; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm.

Authors:  Leamarie T Gordon; Ayanna K Thomas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

9.  Retrieval speeds context fluctuation: why semantic generation enhances later learning but hinders prior learning.

Authors:  Kristin M Divis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

10.  Recent study, but not retrieval, of knowledge protects against learning errors.

Authors:  Hillary G Mullet; Sharda Umanath; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.