Literature DB >> 28394160

Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.

Michael S Cohen1, Jesse Rissman1, Mariam Hovhannisyan1, Alan D Castel1, Barbara J Knowlton1.   

Abstract

People tend to show better memory for information that is deemed valuable or important. By one mechanism, individuals selectively engage deeper, semantic encoding strategies for high value items (Cohen, Rissman, Suthana, Castel, & Knowlton, 2014). By another mechanism, information paired with value or reward is automatically strengthened in memory via dopaminergic projections from midbrain to hippocampus (Shohamy & Adcock, 2010). We hypothesized that the latter mechanism would primarily enhance recollection-based memory, while the former mechanism would strengthen both recollection and familiarity. We also hypothesized that providing interspersed tests during study is a key to encouraging selective engagement of strategies. To test these hypotheses, we presented participants with sets of words, and each word was associated with a high or low point value. In some experiments, free recall tests were given after each list. In all experiments, a recognition test was administered 5 minutes after the final word list. Process dissociation was accomplished via remember/know judgments at recognition, a recall test probing both item memory and memory for a contextual detail (word plurality), and a task dissociation combining a recognition test for plurality (intended to probe recollection) with a speeded item recognition test (to probe familiarity). When recall tests were administered after study lists, high value strengthened both recollection and familiarity. When memory was not tested after each study list, but rather only at the end, value increased recollection but not familiarity. These dual process dissociations suggest that interspersed recall tests guide learners' use of metacognitive control to selectively apply effective encoding strategies. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28394160      PMCID: PMC5624811          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  42 in total

1.  The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments.

Authors:  Laura L Eldridge; Stacey Sarfatti; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning?

Authors:  D L Hintzman; T Curran; B Oppy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Metacognitive control and spaced practice: clarifying what people do and why.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Michael S Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  The two recollections.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; C F A Gomes; R Moran
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Influence of reward motivation on human declarative memory.

Authors:  Ewa A Miendlarzewska; Daphne Bavelier; Sophie Schwartz
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Consolidation power of extrinsic rewards: reward cues enhance long-term memory for irrelevant past events.

Authors:  Kou Murayama; Shinji Kitagami
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-02-18

8.  States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit.

Authors:  Matthias J Gruber; Bernard D Gelman; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Effects of aging on value-directed modulation of semantic network activity during verbal learning.

Authors:  Michael S Cohen; Jesse Rissman; Nanthia A Suthana; Alan D Castel; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Listening for recollection: a multi-voxel pattern analysis of recognition memory retrieval strategies.

Authors:  Joel R Quamme; David J Weiss; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  9 in total

1.  White matter integrity in brain structures supporting semantic processing is associated with value-directed remembering in older adults.

Authors:  Joseph P Hennessee; Nicco Reggente; Michael S Cohen; Jesse Rissman; Alan D Castel; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Value-directed memory effects on item and context memory.

Authors:  Jonathan J Villaseñor; Allison M Sklenar; Andrea N Frankenstein; Pauline Urban Levy; Matthew P McCurdy; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-26

3.  Separate Memory-Enhancing Effects of Reward and Strategic Encoding.

Authors:  Michael S Cohen; Larry Y Cheng; Ken A Paller; Paul J Reber
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Encoding tasks moderated the reward effect on brain activity during memory retrieval.

Authors:  Qianqian Ding; Jinfu Zhu; Chunping Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  The effect of external store reliance on actual and predicted value-directed remembering.

Authors:  Joyce S Park; Megan O Kelly; Mary B Hargis; Evan F Risko
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-02-18

6.  Selective memory disrupted in intra-modal dual-task encoding conditions.

Authors:  Alexander L M Siegel; Shawn T Schwartz; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-24

7.  Memory Recall for High Reward Value Items Correlates With Individual Differences in White Matter Pathways Associated With Reward Processing and Fronto-Temporal Communication.

Authors:  Nicco Reggente; Michael S Cohen; Zhong S Zheng; Alan D Castel; Barbara J Knowlton; Jesse Rissman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Memory Beliefs Drive the Memory Bias on Value-based Decisions.

Authors:  Tehilla Mechera-Ostrovsky; Sebastian Gluth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Neural correlates underlying the effect of reward value on recognition memory.

Authors:  Blake L Elliott; Chris Blais; Samuel M McClure; Gene A Brewer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.