Literature DB >> 21792622

Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation.

Loredana Zollo1, Luca Rossini, Marco Bravi, Giovanni Magrone, Silvia Sterzi, Eugenio Guglielmelli.   

Abstract

This paper is focused on the multimodal analysis of patient performance, carried out by means of robotic technology and wearable sensors, and aims at providing quantitative measure of biomechanical and motion planning features of arm motor control following rehabilitation. Upper-limb robotic therapy was administered to 24 community-dwelling persons with chronic stroke. Performance indices on patient motor performance were computed from data recorded with the InMotion2 robotic machine and a magneto-inertial sensor. Motor planning issues were investigated by means of techniques of motion decomposition into submovements. A linear regression analysis was carried out to study correlation with clinical scales. Robotic outcome measures showed a significant improvement of kinematic motor performance; improvement of dynamic components was more significant in resistive motion and highly correlated with MP. The analysis of motion decomposition into submovements showed an important change with recovery of submovement number, amplitude and order, tending to patterns measured in healthy subjects. Preliminary results showed that arm biomechanical functions can be objectively measured by means of the proposed set of performance indices. Correlation with MP is high, while correlation with FM is moderate. Features related to motion planning strategies can be extracted from submovement analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21792622     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0808-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  45 in total

1.  Kinematic properties of rapid hand movements in a knob turning task.

Authors:  K E Novak; L E Miller; J C Houk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brain repair after stroke.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Motor skills training enhances lesion-induced structural plasticity in the motor cortex of adult rats.

Authors:  T A Jones; C J Chu; L A Grande; A D Gregory
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke.

Authors:  Craig D Takahashi; Lucy Der-Yeghiaian; Vu Le; Rehan R Motiwala; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  The rational use of robots in neurorehabilitation - fact or fiction?

Authors:  Harald Masur
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; M F Levin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 7.  A systematic review of cognitive interventions to improve functional ability in people who have cognitive impairment following stroke.

Authors:  Tammy Hoffmann; Sally Bennett; Chia-Lin Koh; Kryss McKenna
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.119

8.  Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Caitlyn Bosecker; Laura Dipietro; Bruce Volpe; Hermano Igo Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 9.  Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke.

Authors:  A Bowen; N B Lincoln
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

10.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  30 in total

1.  Trends in rehabilitation robotics.

Authors:  Nicolas Garcia; Jose M Sabater-Navarro; E Gugliemeli; A Casals
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Robust and Accurate Capture of Human Joint Pose Using an Inertial Sensor.

Authors:  Pubudu N Pathirana; M Sajeewani Karunarathne; Gareth L Williams; Phan T Nam; Hugh Durrant-Whyte
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  A method for assessing the arm movement performance: probability tube.

Authors:  Miloš Kostić; Mirjana B Popović; Dejan B Popović
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Quantitative assessment of lower limbs gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy based on surface EMG and inertial sensors.

Authors:  Xiang Chen; Qi Wu; Lu Tang; Shuai Cao; Xu Zhang; Xun Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Increasing patient engagement in rehabilitation exercises using computer-based citizen science.

Authors:  Jeffrey Laut; Francesco Cappa; Oded Nov; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An activity recognition model using inertial sensor nodes in a wireless sensor network for frozen shoulder rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Hsueh-Chun Lin; Shu-Yin Chiang; Kai Lee; Yao-Chiang Kan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Clinical validation of kinematic assessments of post-stroke upper limb movements with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton.

Authors:  Florian Grimm; Jelena Kraugmann; Georgios Naros; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measures of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients.

Authors:  Eri Otaka; Yohei Otaka; Shoko Kasuga; Atsuko Nishimoto; Kotaro Yamazaki; Michiyuki Kawakami; Junichi Ushiba; Meigen Liu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  A robotic object hitting task to quantify sensorimotor impairments in participants with stroke.

Authors:  Kathrin Tyryshkin; Angela M Coderre; Janice I Glasgow; Troy M Herter; Stephen D Bagg; Sean P Dukelow; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Can force feedback and science learning enhance the effectiveness of neuro-rehabilitation? An experimental study on using a low-cost 3D joystick and a virtual visit to a zoo.

Authors:  Paolo Cappa; Andrea Clerico; Oded Nov; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.