Literature DB >> 21787100

Quantity judgments of auditory and visual stimuli by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Michael J Beran1.   

Abstract

Many species can choose between two visual sets of stimuli on the basis of quantity. This is true when sets are both visible, or are presented one set at a time or even one item at a time. However, we know comparatively little about how well nonhuman animals can compare auditory quantities. Here, three chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) chose between two sets of food items when they only heard each item fall into different containers rather than seeing those items. This method prevented the chimpanzees from summing the amount of visible food they saw because there were no visual cues. Chimpanzees performed well, and their performance matched that of previous experiments with regard to obeying Weber's law. They also performed well with comparisons between a sequentially presented auditory set and a fully visible set, demonstrating that duration of presentation was not being used as a cue. In addition, they accommodated empty sets into these judgments, although not perfectly. Thus, chimpanzees can judge auditory quantities in flexible ways that show many similarities to how they compare visual quantities. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21787100      PMCID: PMC3208030          DOI: 10.1037/a0024965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  40 in total

1.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  E M Brannon; H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-01

2.  Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-05

3.  Expectations about numerical events in four lemur species (Eulemur fulvus, Eulemur mongoz, Lemur catta and Varecia rubra).

Authors:  Laurie R Santos; Jennifer L Barnes; Neha Mahajan
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) accurately compare poured liquid quantities.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Salamanders ( Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian.

Authors:  Claudia Uller; Robert Jaeger; Gena Guidry; Carolyn Martin
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Number comprehension by a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), including a zero-like concept.

Authors:  Irene M Pepperberg; Jesse D Gordon
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Nonverbal estimation during numerosity judgements by adult humans.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Lauren A Taglialatela; Timothy M Flemming; Frances M James; David A Washburn
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero.

Authors:  D Biro; T Matsuzawa
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2001-06-29       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Horses (Equus caballus) select the greater of two quantities in small numerical contrasts.

Authors:  Claudia Uller; Jennifer Lewis
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  16 in total

1.  Elephants have a nose for quantity.

Authors:  Joshua M Plotnik; Daniel L Brubaker; Rachel Dale; Lydia N Tiller; Hannah S Mumby; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The neuronal code for number.

Authors:  Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Defining value through quantity and quality-Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) undervalue food quantities when items are broken.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Comparative Cognition: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish; Bonnie M Perdue; David A Washburn
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Trading up: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-control through their exchange behavior.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Mattea S Rossettie; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Visual nesting of stimuli affects rhesus monkeys' (Macaca mulatta) quantity judgments in a bisection task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  What counts for 'counting'? Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, respond appropriately to relevant and irrelevant information in a quantity judgment task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Joseph M McIntyre; Alexis Garland; Theodore A Evans
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  When less is more: like humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceive food amounts based on plate size.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Chimpanzees sometimes see fuller as better: judgments of food quantities based on container size and fullness.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Do Social Conditions Affect Capuchin Monkeys' (Cebus apella) Choices in a Quantity Judgment Task?

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.