OBJECT: To assess lung perfusion in young patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) using an arterial spin labeling (ASL) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Perfusion imaging was performed in 5 healthy volunteers and 33 pediatric patients (13 ± 5 years) with CF using an ASL technique. Image quality was evaluated on a five-point scale (1 = excellent). Quantitative perfusion maps were calculated based on the modified Bloch equations. Perfusion differences between volunteers and CF patients and regional differences between lobes were analyzed using Student's t test. The association of perfusion values and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was analyzed using univariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean lung perfusion was 698 ± 67 ml/100g/min (range: 593-777 ml/100g/min) in volunteers and 526 ± 113 ml/100g/min (range: 346-724 ml/100g/min) in CF patients. Median image quality was 2 in volunteers and 3 in CF patients. In CF patients, significantly lower perfusion was observed in the upper lobes compared to healthy volunteers. Mean perfusion values significantly correlated with FEV1 (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: ASL perfusion imaging provides lung perfusion assessment in young CF patients. This non-invasive functional imaging technique is worth being evaluated in the clinical monitoring of CF patients.
OBJECT: To assess lung perfusion in young patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) using an arterial spin labeling (ASL) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Perfusion imaging was performed in 5 healthy volunteers and 33 pediatric patients (13 ± 5 years) with CF using an ASL technique. Image quality was evaluated on a five-point scale (1 = excellent). Quantitative perfusion maps were calculated based on the modified Bloch equations. Perfusion differences between volunteers and CFpatients and regional differences between lobes were analyzed using Student's t test. The association of perfusion values and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was analyzed using univariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean lung perfusion was 698 ± 67 ml/100g/min (range: 593-777 ml/100g/min) in volunteers and 526 ± 113 ml/100g/min (range: 346-724 ml/100g/min) in CFpatients. Median image quality was 2 in volunteers and 3 in CFpatients. In CFpatients, significantly lower perfusion was observed in the upper lobes compared to healthy volunteers. Mean perfusion values significantly correlated with FEV1 (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: ASL perfusion imaging provides lung perfusion assessment in young CFpatients. This non-invasive functional imaging technique is worth being evaluated in the clinical monitoring of CFpatients.
Authors: D A Roberts; W B Gefter; J A Hirsch; R R Rizi; L Dougherty; R E Lenkinski; J S Leigh; M D Schnall Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J A Detre; W Zhang; D A Roberts; A C Silva; D S Williams; D J Grandis; A P Koretsky; J S Leigh Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: N Sommer; A Dietrich; R T Schermuly; H A Ghofrani; T Gudermann; R Schulz; W Seeger; F Grimminger; N Weissmann Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Tungte Wang; Georg Schultz; Helge Hebestreit; Alexandra Hebestreit; Dietbert Hahn; Peter M Jakob Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Grzegorz Bauman; Michael Puderbach; Michael Deimling; Vladimir Jellus; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Julien Dinkel; Christian Hintze; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Lothar R Schad Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Shannon B Donnola; Elliott C Dasenbrook; David Weaver; Lan Lu; Karishma Gupta; Anjali Prabhakaran; Xin Yu; James F Chmiel; Kimberly McBennett; Michael W Konstan; Mitchell L Drumm; Chris A Flask Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Lucy A Fowkes; Dow-Mu Koh; David J Collins; Neil P Jerome; David MacVicar; Sue C Chua; Andrew D J Pearson Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2015-06-05
Authors: Elliott C Dasenbrook; Lan Lu; Shannon Donnola; David E Weaver; Vikas Gulani; Peter M Jakob; Michael W Konstan; Chris A Flask Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240