Literature DB >> 21782375

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with at least 2.5 years' follow-up comparing hamstring tendon autograft and irradiated allograft.

Kang Sun1, Jihua Zhang, Yan Wang, Changsuo Xia, Cailong Zhang, Tengbo Yu, Shaoqi Tian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus irradiated allograft.
METHODS: All irradiated hamstring tendon allografts (gracilis and semitendinosus), which were sterilized with 2.5 Mrad of irradiation before distribution, were obtained from a single certified tissue bank. A total of 78 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were prospectively randomized consecutively into 1 of 2 groups: autograft and irradiated allograft. The same surgical technique was used in all operations, which were performed by the same senior surgeon. Before surgery and at a mean of 42.2 months of follow-up, patients were evaluated by the same observer according to objective and subjective clinical evaluations.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 67 (36 in autograft group and 31 in irradiated allograft group) were available for full evaluation. When the irradiated allograft group was compared with the autograft group at the final follow-up by the Lachman test, anterior drawer test, pivot-shift test, and KT-2000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) assessment, statistically significant differences were found (P = .00011, P = .00016, P = .008, and P = .00021, respectively). Most importantly, 86.1% of patients in the autograft group and only 32.3% in the irradiated allograft group had a side-to-side difference of less than 3 mm according to KT-2000 assessment. The rate of laxity (side-to-side difference >5 mm) with irradiated allograft (32.3%) was higher than that with autograft (8.3%). The anterior and rotational stabilities decreased significantly in the irradiated allograft group. According to the overall International Knee Documentation Committee rating, functional and subjective evaluations, and activity level testing, no statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups. However, patients in the irradiated allograft group had a shorter operative time and a longer duration of postoperative fever. When the patients had a fever, the laboratory examination findings of all patients were almost normal (white blood cell count, normal; erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 8 to 20 mm/h; and C-reactive protein level, 4 to 11 mg/L).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome of ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft was satisfactory, whereas the difference in instrumented laxity between the 2 groups was significant and the difference in functional test results was not significant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21782375     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  27 in total

1.  Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Tahsin Beyzadeoglu; Umut Akgun; Neslihan Tasdelen; Mustafa Karahan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Minimally invasive posterior hamstring harvest.

Authors:  Trent J Wilson; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-08-16

3.  A Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Tibialis Anterior Tendon Allograft: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Saroj Rai; Sheng-Yang Jin; Bimal Rai; Nira Tamang; Wei Huang; Xian-Zhe Liu; Chun-Qing Meng; Hong Wang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 4.  Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Jianzhong Hu; Jin Qu; Daqi Xu; Jingyong Zhou; Hongbin Lu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Effect of a novel sterilization method on biomechanical properties of soft tissue allografts.

Authors:  T Baldini; K Caperton; M Hawkins; E McCarty
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using irradiated versus non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft.

Authors:  Shaoqi Tian; Chengzhi Ha; Bin Wang; Yuanhe Wang; Lun Liu; Qicai Li; Xu Yang; Kang Sun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Risk Factors and Predictors of Subsequent ACL Injury in Either Knee After ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Analysis of 2488 Primary ACL Reconstructions From the MOON Cohort.

Authors:  Christopher C Kaeding; Angela D Pedroza; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  A brief history of tendon and ligament bioreactors: Impact and future prospects.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Dyment; Jennifer G Barrett; Hani A Awad; Catherine A Bautista; Albert J Banes; David L Butler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Allograft tissue irradiation and failure rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jesse Dashe; Robert L Parisien; Antonio Cusano; Emily J Curry; Asheesh Bedi; Xinning Li
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-18

Review 10.  Autograft versus nonirradiated allograft tissue for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael W Mariscalco; Robert A Magnussen; Divyesh Mehta; Timothy E Hewett; David C Flanigan; Christopher C Kaeding
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.