Literature DB >> 21782303

Sex inequalities in physical and mental functioning of British, Finnish, and Japanese civil servants: role of job demand, control and work hours.

Michikazu Sekine1, Takashi Tatsuse2, Sadanobu Kagamimori2, Tarani Chandola3, Noriko Cable3, Michael Marmot3, Pekka Martikainen4, Tea Lallukka5, Ossi Rahkonen5, Eero Lahelma5.   

Abstract

In general, women report more physical and mental symptoms than men. International comparisons of countries with different welfare state regimes may provide further understanding of the social determinants of sex inequalities in health. This study aims to evaluate (1) whether there are sex inequalities in health functioning as measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and (2) whether work characteristics contribute to the sex inequalities in health among employees from Britain, Finland, and Japan, representing liberal, social democratic, and conservative welfare state regimes, respectively. The participants were 7340 (5122 men and 2218 women) British employees, 2297 (1638 men and 659 women) Japanese employees, and 8164 (1649 men and 6515 women) Finnish employees. All the participants were civil servants aged 40-60 years. We found that more women than men tended to have disadvantaged work characteristics (i.e. low employment grade, low job control, high job demands, and long work hours) but such sex differences were relatively smaller among employees from Finland, where more gender equal policies exist than Britain and Japan. The age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of women for poor physical functioning was the largest for British women (OR = 2.08), followed by for Japanese women (OR = 1.72), and then for Finnish women (OR = 1.51). The age-adjusted OR of women for poor mental functioning was the largest for Japanese women (OR = 1.91), followed by for British women (OR = 1.45), and then for Finnish women (OR = 1.07). Thus, sex differences in physical and mental health was the smallest in the Finnish population. The larger the sex differences in work characteristics, the larger the sex differences in health and the reduction in the sex differences in health after adjustment for work characteristics. These results suggest that egalitarian and gender equal policies may contribute to smaller sex differences in health, through smaller differences in disadvantaged work characteristics between men and women.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21782303      PMCID: PMC3159716          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  21 in total

Review 1.  Gender and health: an update on hypotheses and evidence.

Authors:  L M Verbrugge
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1985-09

Review 2.  Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; M N van Poppel; P M Bongers; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Gender differences in unipolar depression: an update of epidemiological findings and possible explanations.

Authors:  C Kuehner
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.392

4.  Gender differences in excessive daytime sleepiness among Japanese workers.

Authors:  Yuriko Doi; Masumi Minowa
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Psychosocial factors at work, personality traits and depressive symptoms. Longitudinal results from the GAZEL Study.

Authors:  S Paterniti; I Niedhammer; T Lang; S M Consoli
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  M G Marmot; G D Smith; S Stansfeld; C Patel; F North; J Head; I White; E Brunner; A Feeney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of socioeconomic differences in physical functioning and perceived health among male and female employees in Britain, Finland and Japan.

Authors:  Pekka Martikainen; Eero Lahelma; Michael Marmot; Michikazu Sekine; Nobuo Nishi; Sadanobu Kagamimori
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Health selection in the Whitehall II study, UK.

Authors:  Tarani Chandola; Mel Bartley; Amanda Sacker; Crispin Jenkinson; Michael Marmot
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Work and family characteristics as determinants of socioeconomic and sex inequalities in sleep: The Japanese Civil Servants Study.

Authors:  Michikazu Sekine; Tarani Chandola; Pekka Martikainen; Michael Marmot; Sadanobu Kagamimori
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in Whitehall II (prospective cohort) study.

Authors:  H Bosma; M G Marmot; H Hemingway; A C Nicholson; E Brunner; S A Stansfeld
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-22
View more
  6 in total

1.  Mortality benefit of participation in BOOCS program: a follow-up study for 15 years in a Japanese working population.

Authors:  Tsutomu Hoshuyama; Keita Odashiro; Mitsuhiro Fukata; Toru Maruyama; Kazuyuki Saito; Chikako Wakana; Michiko Fukumitsu; Takehiko Fujino
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Socioeconomic inequalities in mental well-being among Hungarian adolescents: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Szabolcs Varga; Bettina F Piko; Kevin M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2014-10-28

3.  How do macro-level structural determinants affect inequalities in mental health? - a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A McAllister; S Fritzell; M Almroth; L Harber-Aschan; S Larsson; B Burström
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-12-06

4.  Effect modification by workplace social capital on the association between depression and workplace and family stress: the Japanese civil servant study.

Authors:  Nobue Nakahori; Michikazu Sekine; Takashi Tatsuse; Masaaki Yamada
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Association between gender inequality and population-level health outcomes: Panel data analysis of organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.

Authors:  Cecilia Veas; Francisca Crispi; Cristóbal Cuadrado
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-07-31

6.  Resilience as a Protective Factor for Suicidal Ideation among Korean Workers.

Authors:  Sun Mi Kim; Hye Ri Kim; Kyoung Joon Min; Seo-Koo Yoo; Young-Chul Shin; Eun-Jin Kim; Sang Won Jeon
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.505

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.