BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the relationship between ADC and clinical outcome in HNSCC. Our hypothesis has that relatively high pretreatment ADC would correlate with local failure of HNSCC treated with radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This includes prospective and validation studies. Seventeen patients treated with radiation therapy for primary HNSCC completed the prospective study. Variables considered to affect local failure including MR imaging-related parameters such as ADC and its change ratio were compared between patients with local failure and controls, and those showing difference or association with local failure were further tested by survival analysis. Furthermore, variables were analyzed in 40 patients enrolled in the validation study. RESULTS: Relatively high ADC calculated with b-values (300, 500, 750, and 1000 s/mm(2)) before treatment, high ADC increase ratio, and treatment method (chemoradiotherapy versus radiation therapy alone) revealed significant difference between patients with local failure and controls or association with local failure. In Cox proportional hazard testing, high ADC before treatment alone showed significant association with local failure (P = .0186). In the validation study, tumor volume before treatment, high ADC before treatment, T stage (T12 versus T34), and treatment method showed significance. Tumor volume before treatment (P = .0217) and high ADC before treatment (P = .0001) revealed significant association with local failure in Cox proportional hazard testing. High ADC before treatment was superior to tumor volume before treatment regarding association with local failure. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest pretreatment ADC obtained at high b-values as well as tumor volume correlate with local failure of HNSCC treated with radiation therapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the relationship between ADC and clinical outcome in HNSCC. Our hypothesis has that relatively high pretreatment ADC would correlate with local failure of HNSCC treated with radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This includes prospective and validation studies. Seventeen patients treated with radiation therapy for primary HNSCC completed the prospective study. Variables considered to affect local failure including MR imaging-related parameters such as ADC and its change ratio were compared between patients with local failure and controls, and those showing difference or association with local failure were further tested by survival analysis. Furthermore, variables were analyzed in 40 patients enrolled in the validation study. RESULTS: Relatively high ADC calculated with b-values (300, 500, 750, and 1000 s/mm(2)) before treatment, high ADC increase ratio, and treatment method (chemoradiotherapy versus radiation therapy alone) revealed significant difference between patients with local failure and controls or association with local failure. In Cox proportional hazard testing, high ADC before treatment alone showed significant association with local failure (P = .0186). In the validation study, tumor volume before treatment, high ADC before treatment, T stage (T12 versus T34), and treatment method showed significance. Tumor volume before treatment (P = .0217) and high ADC before treatment (P = .0001) revealed significant association with local failure in Cox proportional hazard testing. High ADC before treatment was superior to tumor volume before treatment regarding association with local failure. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest pretreatment ADC obtained at high b-values as well as tumor volume correlate with local failure of HNSCC treated with radiation therapy.
Authors: Dow-Mu Koh; Erica Scurr; David Collins; Baris Kanber; Andrew Norman; Martin O Leach; Janet E Husband Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Bradford A Moffat; Thomas L Chenevert; Theodore S Lawrence; Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Qian Dong; Christina Tsien; Suresh Mukherji; Douglas J Quint; Stephen S Gebarski; Patricia L Robertson; Larry R Junck; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel A Hamstra; Kuei C Lee; Bradford A Moffat; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Redina Ljumanovic; Johannes A Langendijk; Menno van Wattingen; Barry Schenk; Dirk L Knol; C René Leemans; Jonas A Castelijns Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: B K H Law; A D King; K S Bhatia; A T Ahuja; M K M Kam; B B Ma; Q Y Ai; F K F Mo; J Yuan; D K W Yeung Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lorenzo Preda; Giorgio Conte; Luke Bonello; Caterina Giannitto; Laura L Travaini; Sara Raimondi; Paul E Summers; Ansarin Mohssen; Daniela Alterio; Maria Cossu Rocca; Chiara Grana; Francesca Ruju; Massimo Bellomi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Qi-Yong Ai; Ann D King; Benjamin King Hong Law; David Ka-Wai Yeung; Kunwar S Bhatia; Jing Yuan; Anil T Ahuja; Lok Yiu Sheila Wong; Brigette B Ma; Frankie Kwok Fai Mo; Michael K M Kam Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 2.503