Literature DB >> 21775794

Extension and validation of an analytical model for in vivo PET verification of proton therapy--a phantom and clinical study.

F Attanasi1, A Knopf, K Parodi, H Paganetti, T Bortfeld, V Rosso, A Del Guerra.   

Abstract

The interest in positron emission tomography (PET) as a tool for treatment verification in proton therapy has become widespread in recent years, and several research groups worldwide are currently investigating the clinical implementation. After the first off-line investigation with a PET/CT scanner at MGH (Boston, USA), attention is now focused on an in-room PET application immediately after treatment in order to also detect shorter-lived isotopes, such as O15 and N13, minimizing isotope washout and avoiding patient repositioning errors. Clinical trials are being conducted by means of commercially available PET systems, and other tests are planned using application-dedicated tomographs. Parallel to the experimental investigation and new hardware development, great interest has been shown in the development of fast procedures to provide feedback regarding the delivered dose from reconstructed PET images. Since the thresholds of inelastic nuclear reactions leading to tissue β+ -activation fall within the energy range of 15-20 MeV, the distal activity fall-off is correlated, but not directly matched, to the distal fall-off of the dose distribution. Moreover, the physical interactions leading to β+ -activation and energy deposition are of a different nature. All these facts make it essential to further develop accurate and fast methodologies capable of predicting, on the basis of the planned dose distribution, expected PET images to be compared with actual PET measurements, thus providing clinical feedback on the correctness of the dose delivery and of the irradiation field position. The aim of this study has been to validate an analytical model and to implement and evaluate it in a fast and flexible framework able to locally predict such activity distributions directly taking the reference planning CT and planned dose as inputs. The results achieved in this study for phantoms and clinical cases highlighted the potential of the implemented method to predict expected activity distributions with great accuracy. Thus, the analytical model can be used as a powerful substitute method to the sensitive and time-consuming Monte Carlo approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775794     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/16/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Mapping (15)O production rate for proton therapy verification.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Nathaniel M Alpert; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Mauro Testa; Brian Winey; Marc D Normandin; Helen A Shih; Harald Paganetti; Thomas Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Novel On-line PET Imaging for Intra-Beam Range Verification and Delivery Optimization: A Simulation Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Yuncheng Zhong; Weiguo Lu; Mingli Chen; Zhenyu Xiong; Xinyi Cheng; Kun Hu; Yiping Shao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-30

3.  Technical Design Report for a Carbon-11 Treatment Facility.

Authors:  Liviu Penescu; Thierry Stora; Simon Stegemann; Johanna Pitters; Elisa Fiorina; Ricardo Dos Santos Augusto; Claus Schmitzer; Fredrik Wenander; Katia Parodi; Alfredo Ferrari; Thomas E Cocolios
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Brian Winey; Thomas Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

5.  The effect of anterior proton beams in the setting of a prostate-rectum spacer.

Authors:  John P Christodouleas; Shikui Tang; Robert C Susil; Todd R McNutt; Danny Y Song; Justin Bekelman; Curtiland Deville; Neha Vapiwala; Theodore L Deweese; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Stefan Both
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 1.482

Review 6.  Proton therapy verification with PET imaging.

Authors:  Xuping Zhu; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 11.556

7.  Online proton therapy monitoring: clinical test of a Silicon-photodetector-based in-beam PET.

Authors:  Veronica Ferrero; Elisa Fiorina; Matteo Morrocchi; Francesco Pennazio; Guido Baroni; Giuseppe Battistoni; Nicola Belcari; Niccolo' Camarlinghi; Mario Ciocca; Alberto Del Guerra; Marco Donetti; Simona Giordanengo; Giuseppe Giraudo; Vincenzo Patera; Cristiana Peroni; Angelo Rivetti; Manuel Dionisio da Rocha Rolo; Sandro Rossi; Valeria Rosso; Giancarlo Sportelli; Sara Tampellini; Francesca Valvo; Richard Wheadon; Piergiorgio Cerello; Maria Giuseppina Bisogni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  In Vivo 3-D Dose Verification Using PET/CT Images After Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Lining Sun; Weigang Hu; Songtao Lai; Leijun Shi; Junchao Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  A Feasibility Study on Proton Range Monitoring Using 13N Peak in Inhomogeneous Targets.

Authors:  Md Rafiqul Islam; Mehrdad Shahmohammadi Beni; Akihito Inamura; Nursel Şafakattı; Masayasu Miyake; Mahabubur Rahman; Abul Kalam Fazlul Haque; Shigeki Ito; Shinichi Gotoh; Taiga Yamaya; Hiroshi Watabe
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 10.  Range Verification Methods in Particle Therapy: Underlying Physics and Monte Carlo Modeling.

Authors:  Aafke Christine Kraan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.