Literature DB >> 21775512

From humans to rats and back again: bridging the divide between human and animal studies of recognition memory with receiver operating characteristics.

Joshua D Koen1, Andrew P Yonelinas.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) have been used extensively to study the processes underlying human recognition memory, and this method has recently been applied in studies of rats. However, the extent to which the results from human and animal studies converge is neither entirely clear, nor is it known how the different methods used to obtain ROCs in different species impact the results. A recent study used a response bias ROC manipulation with rats and demonstrated that speeding memory responses reduced the contribution of recollection, not familiarity. The current study confirms this finding in humans using a comparable response bias method. Moreover, a comparison of the response bias methods commonly used in animal studies and the confidence rating method typically employed in human studies produced similar ROC functions. The present results suggest that the analysis of recognition memory ROCs provides a fruitful method to bridge the human and animal memory literatures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775512      PMCID: PMC3145157          DOI: 10.1101/lm.2214511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  24 in total

1.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus.

Authors:  Norbert J Fortin; Sean P Wright; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; C F Sheu; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

7.  Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: effects of interference and of response speed.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas; L L Jacoby
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1994-12

8.  Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition.

Authors:  M K Johnson; J Kounios; J A Reeder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Neal E A Kroll; Joel R Quamme; Michele M Lazzara; Mary-Jane Sauvé; Keith F Widaman; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  7 in total

1.  Two processes support visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Sebastian Guderian; Danielle Brigham; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ROC residuals in signal-detection models of recognition memory.

Authors:  David Kellen; Henrik Singmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

3.  Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Mariam Aly; Wei-Chun Wang; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The ROC Toolbox: A toolbox for analyzing receiver-operating characteristics derived from confidence ratings.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Frederick S Barrett; Iain M Harlow; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

5.  Criterion noise in ratings-based recognition: evidence from the effects of response scale length on recognition accuracy.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Jonathan G Tullis; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Still no evidence for the encoding variability hypothesis: a reply to Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012) and Starns, Rotello, and Ratcliff (2012).

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Recognition errors suggest fast familiarity and slow recollection in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.460

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.