Literature DB >> 21773828

Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature.

Philippe Delincé1, Dior Ghafil.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Is it rational to recommend surgical reconstruction of the torn anterior cruciate ligament to every patient? Is conservative management still a valid option?
METHOD: Through a literature review, we looked for the arguments from each side and checked their validity.
RESULTS: Unfortunately results of most studies cannot be compared because of the following reasons not exhaustively cited: studied populations differed with respect to age, sex, professional and sports activity level, lesions associated with ACL rupture, patient recruitment methods, time from injury to treatment and different therapeutic modalities. Furthermore, various methods were used to evaluate the clinical and radiological results and there was no consensus of their interpretation. Some authors assumed that the incidence of further meniscus lesions could probably be reduced if the torn ACL was surgically reconstructed. But, we have no evidence to believe that this would be due to the surgical repair rather than to a decrease of involvement in strenuous activities. At present it is not demonstrated that ACL-plasty can prevent osteoarthritis. Numerous factors could explain evolution to arthrosis whatever the treatment for the ACL-ruptured knee. Studies comparing surgical and conservative treatments confirm that ACL reconstruction is not the pre-requisite for returning to sporting activities. More recent and scientifically well-designed studies demonstrate that conservative treatment could give satisfactory results for many patients. They suggest some methods to help them choose the best treatment.
CONCLUSION: At present there are no evidence-based arguments to recommend a systematic surgical reconstruction to any patient who tore his ACL. Knee stability can be improved not only by surgery but also by neuromuscular rehabilitation. Whatever the treatment, fully normal knee kinematics are not restored. While the patients wish to go back to their sport and want everything possible done to prolong their ability to perform these activities, they should be informed that the risk of further knee lesions and osteoarthritis remains high, whatever the treatment, surgical or conservative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review of Level I, II, III and IV studies, Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21773828     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1614-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  109 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Performance-based functional evaluation of non-operative and operative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  H Moksnes; M A Risberg
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  MRI of anterior cruciate ligament healing.

Authors:  H Ihara; M Miwa; K Deya; K Torisu
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Effects of meniscal and articular surface status on knee stability, function, and symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term prospective study.

Authors:  W Howard Wu; Thomas Hackett; John C Richmond
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Septic arthritis of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a stage-adapted treatment regimen.

Authors:  Arndt P Schulz; Sebastian Götze; Hergo G K Schmidt; Christian Jürgens; Maximilian Faschingbauer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Changes in synovial fluid cytokine and keratan sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  M Cameron; A Buchgraber; H Passler; M Vogt; E Thonar; F Fu; C H Evans
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Retrospective direct comparison of three intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  P F Holmes; S L James; R L Larson; K M Singer; D C Jones
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Prevalence of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis 15 years after nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Neuman; Martin Englund; Ioannis Kostogiannis; Thomas Fridén; Harald Roos; Leif E Dahlberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Clinically assessed knee joint laxity as a predictor for reconstruction after an anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study of 100 patients treated with activity modification and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ioannis Kostogiannis; Eva Ageberg; Paul Neuman; Leif E Dahlberg; Thomas Fridén; Harald Roos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  43 in total

1.  Results of meniscectomy and meniscal repair in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Davide Deledda; Federica Rosso; Umberto Cottino; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsoukas; Vasilios Fotopoulos; Georgios Basdekis; Konstantinos G Makridis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Specific compartmental analysis of cartilage status in double-bundle ACL reconstruction patients: a comparative study using pre- and postoperative MR images.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Yu Mi Jeong; Jae Ang Sim; Ji Hoon Kwak; Kwang Hee Kim; Shin Woo Nam; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Biomechanical and neuromuscular characteristics of male athletes: implications for the development of anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention programs.

Authors:  Dai Sugimoto; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Jurdan Mendiguchía; Kristian Samuelsson; Jon Karlsson; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  [Early surgery for menisco-ligamental injuries in elite athletes].

Authors:  J Schneider
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Postoperative change in the length and extrusion of the medial meniscus after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Shinji Narazaki; Takayuki Furumatsu; Takaaki Tanaka; Masataka Fujii; Shinichi Miyazawa; Hiroto Inoue; Yasunori Shimamura; Kenta Saiga; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of literature.

Authors:  Piia Suomalainen; Pekka Kannus; Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Anterior cruciate ligament tears: what we already know.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Mattia Loppini; John B King
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The effects of femoral graft placement on cartilage thickness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eziamaka C Okafor; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Margaret R Widmyer; Ermias S Abebe; Amber T Collins; Dean C Taylor; Charles E Spritzer; C T Moorman; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament tear without reconstruction: a longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Christian Konrads; Stephan Reppenhagen; Daniel Belder; Sascha Goebel; Maximilian Rudert; Thomas Barthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.