Literature DB >> 19956116

Editorial: CTC interpretation by gastroenterologists: feasible but largely impractical, undesirable, and misguided.

Perry J Pickhardt.   

Abstract

As shown by Young et al. (1) in this issue of the Americn Journal of Gastroenterology, adequate diagnostic performance in the interpretation of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) would appear to be achievable for a subset of gastroenterologists with a specific interest in colorectal screening. Although it is likely that some gastroenterologists will aspire to interpret CTC in clinical practice, there are a number of issues and circumstances that should first be considered, as they may dampen this enthusiasm somewhat. In the end, quality assurance measures will help ensure adequate performance levels for CTC interpretation, whether read by radiologists or nonradiologists. This editorial commentary will review the relevant issues surrounding CTC interpretation by gastroenterologists.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19956116     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  3 in total

Review 1.  Evidence review and status update on computed tomography colonography.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.