Literature DB >> 21772938

Capsule endoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms.

Andreas Sieg1.   

Abstract

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) may be a means to overcome the low adherence to colorectal cancer screening. The device is an ingestible capsule with a video camera at both ends that can take photographs as it progresses through the gastrointestinal tract. PillCam colon (PCC1) may be used for structural evaluation of the large bowel following an adequate cleaning procedure. PCC1 measures 11 mm × 31 mm and has dual cameras that enable the device to acquire video images from both ends with a wide coverage area, automatic light control and a frame rate of four frames per second. The system includes a sensor array and data recorder connected to the patient during the procedure. The recorded data are downloaded to the Given Imaging Rapid workstation for review of the colon video. The second generation of PillCam Colon (PCC2) is similar to PCC1 and incorporates new developments. The angle of view has been increased to 172 degrees. It has an adaptive frame rate, alternating from 35 frames per second while in motion to 4 images when virtually stationary. The new RAPID(®) software now includes a simple graphic interface tool for polyp size estimation. The procedure of bowel cleansing until capsule ingestion is similar to that used for traditional colonoscopy. However it is more rigorous as the bowel cleanliness for capsule colonoscopy has to be excellent or at least good to result in an adequate sensitivity of the method. Briefly, it consists of 3.5-4 L of split dose polyethylene glycol. Oral NaP boosters are administered after 1-2 h if the capsule has entered the small bowel. Sodium phosphate (NaP) seems to be a necessary adjunct to the regimen because the total transit time is doubled without NaP. The cleansing level was considered to be good to excellent in 72%-88% in studies with PCC1. The sensitivity for significant polyps (> 6 mm or more than 3 polyps >3 mm) ranged from 63%-88% with specificities between 64%-94%. PCC2 showed an improved sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 76%. CCE seems to be a safe and effective method of visualizing the colonic mucosa through colon fluids without the need for sedation or insufflation of air. The sensitivity of CCE to detect polyps, advanced adenomas and cancer is lower compared to optical colonoscopy but improvements will be made in the near future. With an increased recording duration, even a panenteric examination of the whole gastrointestinal tract may be possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon capsule endoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Conventional colonoscopy; PillCam colon

Year:  2011        PMID: 21772938      PMCID: PMC3139277          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i5.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  33 in total

1.  Computed image modification for enhancement of small-bowel surface structures at video capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  J Pohl; I Aschmoneit; S Schuhmann; C Ell
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Meta-analysis shows colon capsule endoscopy is effective in detecting colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Riccardo Marmo; Lucio Petruzziello; Maria Elena Riccioni; Angelo Zullo; Paola Cesaro; Julia Pilz; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening?

Authors:  Avlin Imaeda; Danielle Bender; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  An active endoscopic robot based on wireless power transmission and electromagnetic localization.

Authors:  Hongwei Li; Guozheng Yan; Guanying Ma
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy.

Authors:  R Eliakim; K Yassin; Y Niv; Y Metzger; J Lachter; E Gal; B Sapoznikov; F Konikoff; G Leichtmann; Z Fireman; Y Kopelman; S N Adler
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer.

Authors:  André Van Gossum; Miguel Munoz-Navas; Miguel Munoz Navas; Iñaqui Fernandez-Urien; Cristina Carretero; Gérard Gay; Michel Delvaux; Marie Georges Lapalus; Thierry Ponchon; Horst Neuhaus; Michael Philipper; Guido Costamagna; Maria Elena Riccioni; Cristiano Spada; Lucio Petruzziello; Chris Fraser; Aymer Postgate; Aine Fitzpatrick; Friedrich Hagenmuller; Martin Keuchel; Nathalie Schoofs; Jacques Devière
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Could the colonic capsule PillCam Colon be clinically useful for selecting patients who deserve a complete colonoscopy?: results of clinical comparison with colonoscopy in the perspective of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Gerard Gay; Michel Delvaux; Muriel Frederic; Isaac Fassler
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Alicia Y Toledano; Jay P Heiken; Abraham Dachman; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy K Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Benjamin A Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Michael Hoffmeister; Volker Arndt; Christa Stegmaier; Lutz Altenhofen; Ulrike Haug
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Is PillCam COLON capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community gastroenterology practice.

Authors:  Andreas Sieg; Kilian Friedrich; Ulla Sieg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  5 in total

1.  First Pillcam Colon 2 capsule images of Whipple's disease: Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Bogdan Radu Mateescu; Andreea Bengus; Madalina Marinescu; Florica Staniceanu; Gianina Micu; Lucian Negreanu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-12-16

2.  Colon capsule endoscopy: detection of colonic polyps compared with conventional colonoscopy and visualization of extracolonic pathologies.

Authors:  Alexander F Hagel; Erwin Gäbele; Martin Raithel; Wolfgang H Hagel; Heinz Albrecht; Thomas M de Rossi; Christine Singer; Thomas Schneider; Markus F Neurath; Michael J Farnbacher
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-02

Review 3.  Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-07-01

4.  Confocal endomicroscopy of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Vivian M Ussui; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon capsule endoscopy accuracy for colorectal cancer screening. An alternative during the Covid-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Marianny Sulbaran; Leonardo Bustamante-Lopez; Wanderley Bernardo; Christiano M Sakai; Paulo Sakai; Sergio Nahas; Eduardo G H de Moura
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 1.687

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.