Literature DB >> 20042716

Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study.

Hermann Brenner1, Michael Hoffmeister, Volker Arndt, Christa Stegmaier, Lutz Altenhofen, Ulrike Haug.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is used for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer, but evidence on the magnitude of overall protection and protection according to anatomical site through colonoscopy performed in the community setting is sparse. We assessed whether receiving a colonoscopy in the preceding 10-year period, compared with no colonoscopy, was associated with prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms (defined as cancers or advanced adenomas) at various anatomical sites.
METHODS: A statewide cross-sectional study was conducted among 3287 participants in screening colonoscopy between May 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, from the state of Saarland in Germany who were aged 55 years or older. Prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms was ascertained by screening colonoscopy and histopathologic examination of any polyps excised. Previous colonoscopy history was obtained by standardized questionnaire, and its association with prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasms was estimated, after adjustment for potential confounding factors by log-binomial regression.
RESULTS: Advanced colorectal neoplasms were detected in 308 (11.4%) of the 2701 participants with no previous colonoscopy compared with 36 (6.1%) of the 586 participants who had undergone colonoscopy within the preceding 10 years. After adjustment, overall and site-specific adjusted prevalence ratios for previous colonoscopy in the previous 10-year period were as follows: overall, 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37 to 0.73); cecum and ascending colon, 0.99 (95% CI = 0.50 to 1.97); hepatic flexure and transverse colon, 1.21 (95% CI = 0.60 to 2.42); right-sided colon combined (cecum to transverse colon), 1.05 (95% CI = 0.63 to 1.76); splenic flexure and descending colon, 0.36 (95% CI = 0.16 to 0.82); sigmoid colon, 0.29 (95% CI = 0.16 to 0.53); rectum, 0.07 (95% CI = 0.02 to 0.40); left colon and rectum combined (splenic flexure to rectum, referred to as left-sided elsewhere), 0.33 (95% CI = 0.21 to 0.53).
CONCLUSION: Prevalence of left-sided advanced colorectal neoplasms, but not right-sided advanced neoplasms, was strongly reduced within a 10-year period after colonoscopy, even in the community setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20042716     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  188 in total

1.  Treatment of alcoholic methadone-maintenance patients with disulfiram.

Authors:  A Pugliese; M Martinez; A Maselli; D H Zalick
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1975-11

2.  Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate - review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods.

Authors:  Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Francisco C Ramirez; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 4.  Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Tan Arulampalam; John D Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Joan L Warren; Michael J Barrett; Therese A Stukel; V Paul Doria-Rose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Colorectal cancer prevention with colonoscopy: recent research and debate.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-07

Review 7.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 8.  Status of colorectal cancer devices: present scenario.

Authors:  Shammy Chandel; Reyhan Akhtar; Pooja Sarotra; Bikash Medhi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2015-06

9.  Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Lynn F Butterly; Christina M Robinson; Martha Goodrich; Julia E Weiss
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.