Literature DB >> 32158631

Bioprocessing of shrimp wastes to obtain chitosan and its antimicrobial potential in the context of ethanolic fermentation against bacterial contamination.

Isabella C Tanganini1, Ligianne D Shirahigue1, Mariana Altenhofen da Silva1, Kelly R Francisco2, Sandra R Ceccato-Antonini1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the bioprocessing of shrimp wastes to obtain chitin and its deacetylated product chitosan by a fermentation process mediated by Lactobacillus plantarum. The concentrations of glucose, bacterial inoculum, and shrimp wastes in the Man, Rogosa and Sharpe medium were optimized for the fermentation process performed in shake flasks to achieve the maximum titratable acidity to obtain chitin. The experiments were scaled up in a 700-mL working volume bioreactor, and the resulting chitin was deacetylated by the autoclave method. The bioextracted chitosan was characterized (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy [FTIR], deacetylation degree, and molecular weight) and evaluated for its antimicrobial effects by comparing it with a commercial chitosan sample in the context of the ethanolic fermentation process for fuel alcohol production. The effect of chitosan on such a fermentation process has not been determined yet. The bacterial contaminant Lactobacillus fermentum and the main agent of ethanolic fermentation Saccharomyces cerevisiae were cultured in semi-synthetic medium and co-cultured in sugarcane juice to verify the effect of chitosan on their growth. The bioextracted chitosan (molecular weight 4.0 × 105 g mol-1 and deacetylation degree 80%) was comparable to commercial chitosan, although higher concentrations of the former were required to achieve similar antimicrobial activities. Both commercial and bioextracted chitosan samples exhibited antimicrobial activity against S. cerevisiae and L. fermentum, but the concentration that caused the inhibition of yeast growth was almost tenfold higher than for the bacterium. Moreover, bioextracted chitosan showed no yeast inhibition or lethality in the range of 0.0075-0.96% while for the bacterium, growth inhibition occurred in concentrations varying from 0.24 to 0.48% and lethality of more than 99% at 0.96%. These results indicate the potential use of chitosan and especially of bioextracted chitosan in the bioethanol industry as a safer and more natural approach to combat unwanted bacterial contamination. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethanol; Chitin; Lactic acid bacteria; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sugarcane juice

Year:  2020        PMID: 32158631      PMCID: PMC7040113          DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-2128-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3 Biotech        ISSN: 2190-5738            Impact factor:   2.406


  28 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review.

Authors:  Ming Kong; Xi Guang Chen; Ke Xing; Hyun Jin Park
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria.

Authors:  B Herigstad; M Hamilton; J Heersink
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.

Authors:  M M Bradford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Optimization of chitin extraction from shrimp waste with Bacillus pumilus A1 using response surface methodology.

Authors:  Olfa Ghorbel-Bellaaj; Sawssen Hajji; Islem Younes; Moncef Chaabouni; Moncef Nasri; Kemel Jellouli
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 6.953

Review 5.  Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Disruption of protein synthesis as antifungal mode of action by chitosan.

Authors:  Imelda Galván Márquez; Jones Akuaku; Isabel Cruz; James Cheetham; Ashkan Golshani; Myron L Smith
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 7.  Microbial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  M Beckner; M L Ivey; T G Phister
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.858

8.  Production of chitin from shrimp shell powders using Serratia marcescens B742 and Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 8014 successive two-step fermentation.

Authors:  Hongcai Zhang; Yafang Jin; Yun Deng; Danfeng Wang; Yanyun Zhao
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Comparative evaluation of chitosan, cellulose acetate, and polyethersulfone nanofiber scaffolds for neural differentiation.

Authors:  Jian Du; Elaine Tan; Hyo Jun Kim; Allen Zhang; Rahul Bhattacharya; Kevin J Yarema
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 9.381

Review 10.  Chitosan and its antimicrobial potential--a critical literature survey.

Authors:  Dina Raafat; Hans-Georg Sahl
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.