Literature DB >> 21769145

Effect of dispositional traits on pharmacy students' attitude toward cheating.

Marilyn D Saulsbury1, Ulysses J Brown, Simone O Heyliger, Ruby L Beale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relation between dispositional traits and pharmacy students' attitudes toward cheating in a university setting.
METHODS: A questionnaire was administered primarily to pharmacy students at a comprehensive university in the southeastern United States to assess self-esteem, self-efficacy, idealism, relativism, student attitudes toward cheating, tolerance for peer cheating, detachment from the university, Machiavellian behavior, and demographic information.
RESULTS: Gender, degree of idealism, relativism, and Machiavellian traits were found to influence student attitudes toward cheating, while age, grade-point average (GPA), race, income, and marital status did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Considered collectively, these data support the study model prediction that the major determinants of student attitudes toward cheating are based on the degree of idealism and relativism evident in the students' dispositional trait. Idealism was found to be inversely related to the likelihood of a student engaging in cheating or tolerating peer cheating.

Keywords:  attitudes; behavior; cheating; ethics; pharmacy students

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21769145      PMCID: PMC3138350          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe75469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  14 in total

1.  Are "tomorrow's doctors" honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students' attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct.

Authors:  S C Rennie; J R Crosby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-03

2.  Cheating must be okay--everybody does it!

Authors:  Daryle L Brown
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.082

3.  Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study.

Authors:  Trevor S Harding; Donald D Carpenter; Cynthia J Finelli; Honor J Passow
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  An investigation of academic dishonesty in allied health: incidence and definitions.

Authors:  D Falleur
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  1990

5.  Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students.

Authors:  Suzanne M Rabi; Lynn R Patton; Nancy Fjortoft; David P Zgarrick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Students' moral reasoning, Machiavellianism and socially desirable responding: implications for teaching ethics and research integrity.

Authors:  Darko Hren; Ana Vujaklija; Ranka Ivanisević; Josip Knezević; Matko Marusić; Ana Marusić
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  A pilot study of nursing student's perceptions of academic dishonesty: a generation Y perspective.

Authors:  Afua O Arhin
Journal:  ABNF J       Date:  2009

8.  Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: an empirical investigation.

Authors:  Donald L McCabe
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 1.726

9.  Creating environments that foster academic integrity.

Authors:  Michelle Pixley Tippitt; Nell Ard; Juanita Reese Kline; Joan Tilghman; Barbara Chamberlain; P Gail Meagher
Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

10.  Undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students' perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty.

Authors:  Greg Ryan; Helen Bonanno; Ines Krass; Karen Scouller; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.047

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gender-Based Differences Among Pharmacy Students Involved in Academically Dishonest Behavior.

Authors:  Eric J Ip; Jai Pal; Shadi Doroudgar; Monica K Bidwal; Bijal Shah-Manek
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.047

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.