Literature DB >> 2272891

An investigation of academic dishonesty in allied health: incidence and definitions.

D Falleur1.   

Abstract

Educators in the health sciences are concerned about academic dishonesty and are searching for methods to control misconduct. If students falsify academic work, their behavior pattern may continue in professional practice, endangering the health and well-being of the patients in their care. This paper presents the results of a study of the attitudes and experiences regarding dishonest academic behaviors of a sample of 244 students and 31 faculty in the School of Health Professions at Southwest Texas State University. Student and faculty definitions of dishonest behavior were compared, and the incidence of dishonest behavior and the experiences of faculty in recognizing and disciplining students for academic misconduct were analyzed. Major findings included: 1) faculty, undergraduate, and graduate students differ in their definitions of some types of dishonest behavior; and 2) the most common types of dishonest behavior identified by faculty and students involve cheating and plagiarism. Future research is warranted with attention given to the causal factors leading to academic dishonesty and patterns of dishonesty in academic and practice settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2272891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allied Health        ISSN: 0090-7421


  2 in total

1.  Fraud in mental health practice: a risk management perspective.

Authors:  William A Maesen
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  1991-07

2.  Effect of dispositional traits on pharmacy students' attitude toward cheating.

Authors:  Marilyn D Saulsbury; Ulysses J Brown; Simone O Heyliger; Ruby L Beale
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.