Literature DB >> 21768546

Polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting versus Zotarolimus-eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial.

Steffen Massberg1, Robert A Byrne, Adnan Kastrati, Stefanie Schulz, Jürgen Pache, Jörg Hausleiter, Tareq Ibrahim, Massimiliano Fusaro, Ilka Ott, Albert Schömig, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Julinda Mehilli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Durable polymer coatings have been implicated in mid- and long-term adverse events after drug-eluting stent implantation. A polymer-free dual-drug sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and a new generation permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent are recently developed technologies demonstrating encouraging results. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In a clinical trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 3002 patients to treatment with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority of the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents. The primary end point was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of occurrence of the primary end point (13.1% versus 13.5%, respectively, P(noninferiority)=0.006; hazard ratio=0.97, 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.19; P(superiority)=0.74). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was low in both groups (1.1% versus 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio=0.91 [95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.84], P=0.80). With regard to angiographic efficacy, there were no differences between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of either in-segment binary angiographic restenosis (13.3% versus 13.4% respectively; P=0.95) or in-stent late luminal loss (0.31±0.58 mm versus 0.29±0.56 mm, respectively; P=0.46).
CONCLUSION: In this large-scale study powered for clinical end points, a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to a new generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent out to 12 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT 00598533.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21768546     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  31 in total

Review 1.  Restenosis after PCI. Part 2: prevention and therapy.

Authors:  J Wouter Jukema; Tarek A N Ahmed; Jeffrey J W Verschuren; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention: balloons, stents and scaffolds.

Authors:  Roisin Colleran; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Polymer-Free Drug-Coated Coronary Stents in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease at High Bleeding Risk.

Authors:  Hemang B Panchal; Ramesh Daggubati; David Zhao; Sunil V Rao; Timir Paul
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Drug-eluting stents and acute myocardial infarction: A lethal combination or friends?

Authors:  Shuji Otsuki; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

Review 5.  Choosing the right coronary stent in the modern era.

Authors:  Bora Toklu; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  New concepts in the design of drug-eluting coronary stents.

Authors:  Scot Garg; Christos Bourantas; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  New-Generation Coronary Stents: Current Data and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ankur Kalra; Hasan Rehman; Sahil Khera; Braghadheeswar Thyagarajan; Deepak L Bhatt; Neal S Kleiman; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 8.  Non-polymer drug-eluting coronary stents.

Authors:  Nagavendra Kommineni; Raju Saka; Wahid Khan; Abraham J Domb
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 9.  Implementation of standardized assessment and reporting of myocardial infarction in contemporary randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sergio Leonardi; Paul W Armstrong; Phillip J Schulte; E Magnus Ohman; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  An update on drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Scot Garg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.