Literature DB >> 28185168

Polymer-Free Drug-Coated Coronary Stents in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease at High Bleeding Risk.

Hemang B Panchal1, Ramesh Daggubati2, David Zhao3, Sunil V Rao4, Timir Paul5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and a high risk of bleeding are not ideal candidates for a polymer-based drug-eluting stent (DES) because it requires 6-12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The purpose of this review is to assess the angiographic and clinical outcomes of polymer-free drug-coated stents (PF-DCS) in stable CAD patients with a high bleeding risk. RECENT
FINDINGS: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared angiographic and clinical outcomes of PF-DCS with bare-metal stents (BMS), permanent polymer (PP)-DES, or biodegradable polymer (BP)-DES. However, none of these studies particularly recruited patients with stable CAD and a high risk of bleeding. Furthermore, there are limited data available on duration of DAPT following PF-DCS placement. PF-DCS has a better efficacy and similar safety as compared with BMS. PF-DCS with dual drug is noninferior to currently available PP-DES. Further RCTs are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of PF-DCS to BP-DES and PP-DES comparing shorter to standard durations of DAPT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bleeding risk; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Polymer-free drug-coated stents; Stable coronary artery disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28185168     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-017-0819-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  30 in total

1.  A multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus- with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

Authors:  Didier Carrié; Jacques Berland; Stefan Verheye; Karl Eugen Hauptmann; Mathias Vrolix; Roberto Violini; Alain Dibie; Sergio Berti; Eric Maupas; David Antoniucci; Joachim Schofer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting and bare metal stents: comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Ajay J Kirtane; Anuj Gupta; Srinivas Iyengar; Jeffrey W Moses; Martin B Leon; Robert Applegate; Bruce Brodie; Edward Hannan; Kishore Harjai; Lisette Okkels Jensen; Seung-Jung Park; Raphael Perry; Michael Racz; Francesco Saia; Jack V Tu; Ron Waksman; Alexandra J Lansky; Roxana Mehran; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Efficacy and safety of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the EVOLVE II Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Dean J Kereiakes; Ian T Meredith; Stephan Windecker; R Lee Jobe; Shamir R Mehta; Ian J Sarembock; Robert L Feldman; Bernardo Stein; Christophe Dubois; Timothy Grady; Shigeru Saito; Takeshi Kimura; Thomas Christen; Dominic J Allocco; Keith D Dawkins
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Polymer-free biolimus a9-coated stent demonstrates more sustained intimal inhibition, improved healing, and reduced inflammation compared with a polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting cypher stent in a porcine model.

Authors:  Norio Tada; Renu Virmani; Gordon Grant; Lauren Bartlett; Alexander Black; Claudia Clavijo; Uwe Christians; Ron Betts; Doug Savage; Shih-Horng Su; John Shulze; Saibal Kar
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.546

5.  Two-year clinical outcomes of different drug-eluting stents with different polymer coating strategies in coronary artery heart disease: a multi-centre, randomised, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Junle Shen; Zhifeng Li; Aidong Zhu; Yuelong Yuan; Ruihua Yue; Jia Yuan; Yuehui Yin; Qiang She; Yunqing Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Randomized comparison between polymer-free versus polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent: two-year final clinical results.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Shiratori; Clarissa Cola; Salvatore Brugaletta; Luis Alvarez-Contreras; Victoria Martín-Yuste; Bruno García del Blanco; Rafael Ruiz-Salmeron; Jose Díaz; Eduardo Pinar; Vicens Martí; Juan García-Picart; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 6.546

7.  Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries.

Authors:  W J van der Giessen; A M Lincoff; R S Schwartz; H M van Beusekom; P W Serruys; D R Holmes; S G Ellis; E J Topol
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A polymer-free dual drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial vs. polymer-based drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Robert A Byrne; Julinda Mehilli; Raisuke Iijima; Stefanie Schulz; Jürgen Pache; Melchior Seyfarth; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Randomized trial of three rapamycin-eluting stents with different coating strategies for the reduction of coronary restenosis.

Authors:  Julinda Mehilli; Robert A Byrne; Anna Wieczorek; Raisuke Iijima; Stefanie Schulz; Olga Bruskina; Jürgen Pache; Rainer Wessely; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Real polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents for obstructive coronary artery disease: DKPLUS-Wave 1, a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial.

Authors:  Shao-Liang Chen; Fei Ye; Jun-Jie Zhang; Jian-Jun Zou; Xue-Song Qian; Feng Li; Song Yang; Zhen Ge; Shou-Jie Shan; Xiao-Bo Li; Tian Xu; Jing Kan; Ling Lin; Ya-Ling Han
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.023

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.