Literature DB >> 21767032

Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.

Paul W Eastwick1, Alice H Eagly, Eli J Finkel, Sarah E Johnson.   

Abstract

Five studies develop and examine the predictive validity of an implicit measure of the preference for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner. Three hypotheses were generally supported. First, 2 variants of the go/no-go association task revealed that participants, on average, demonstrate an implicit preference (i.e., a positive spontaneous affective reaction) for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner. Second, these implicit measures were not redundant with a traditional explicit measure: The correlation between these constructs was .00 on average, and the implicit measures revealed no reliable sex differences, unlike the explicit measure. Third, explicit and implicit measures exhibited a double dissociation in predictive validity. Specifically, explicit preferences predicted the extent to which attractiveness was associated with participants' romantic interest in opposite-sex photographs but not their romantic interest in real-life opposite-sex speed-daters or confederates. Implicit preferences showed the opposite pattern. This research extends prior work on implicit processes in romantic relationships and offers the first demonstration that any measure of a preference for a particular characteristic in a romantic partner (an implicit measure of physical attractiveness, in this case) predicts individuals' evaluation of live potential romantic partners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767032     DOI: 10.1037/a0024061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction.

Authors:  Andrea L Meltzer; James K McNulty; Grace L Jackson; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-10-14

2.  The effect of mating market dynamics on partner preference and relationship quality among Himba pastoralists.

Authors:  Sean Prall; Brooke Scelza
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 14.957

3.  Dominant, open nonverbal displays are attractive at zero-acquaintance.

Authors:  Tanya Vacharkulksemsuk; Emily Reit; Poruz Khambatta; Paul W Eastwick; Eli J Finkel; Dana R Carney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The role of fragrance and self-esteem in perception of body odors and impressions of others.

Authors:  Ilja Croijmans; Daniel Beetsma; Henk Aarts; Ilse Gortemaker; Monique Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sexual Arousal and Implicit and Explicit Determinants of Condom Use Intentions.

Authors:  Kenny Wolfs; Arjan E R Bos; Fraukje E F Mevissen; Gjalt-Jorn Y Peters; Jacques J D M van Lankveld
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2018-07-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.