Literature DB >> 14604903

WHO evaluates NICE.

Nancy Devlin, David Parkin, Marthe Gold.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14604903      PMCID： PMC261731          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  A technocratic fix to the "legitimacy problem"? The Blair government and health care rationing in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Keith Syrett
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.265

2.  Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis.

Authors:  Nancy Devlin; David Parkin
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?

Authors:  Nancy Devlin; John Appleby; David Parkin
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2003-07
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  A stated preference binary choice experiment to explore NICE decision making.

Authors:  Paul Tappenden; John Brazier; Julie Ratcliffe; James Chilcott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Should NICE evaluate complementary and alternative medicine?

Authors:  Linda Franck; Cyril Chantler; Michael Dixon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-10

Review 3.  Public and patient involvement at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

Authors:  Leela Barham
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.