| Literature DB >> 21765605 |
Sirichai Adisakwattana1, Sirintorn Yibchok-Anun, Piyawan Charoenlertkul, Natthakarn Wongsasiripat.
Abstract
The inhibitory activity on intestinal α-glucosidase by cyanidin-3-rutinoside was examined in vitro and in vivo. The IC(50) values of cyanidin-3-rutinoside against intestinal maltase, and sucrase were 2,323 ± 14.8 and 250.2 ± 8.1 µM, respectively. The kinetic analysis revealed that intestinal sucrase was inhibited by cyanidin-3-rutinoside in a mixed-type manner. The synergistic inhibition also found in combination of cyanidin-3-rutinoside with acarbose against intestinal maltase and sucrase. The oral administration of cyanidin-3-rutinoside (100 and 300 mg/kg) plus maltose or sucrose to normal rats, postprandial plasma glucose was markedly suppressed at 30-90 min after loading. Furthermore, the normal rats treated with acarbose and cyanidin-3-rutinoside (30 mg/kg) showed greater reduction of postprandial plasma glucose than the group treated with acarbose alone. These results suggest that cyanidin-3-rutinoside retards absorption of carbohydrates by inhibition of α-glucosidase which may be useful as a potential inhibitor for prevention and treatment of diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Keywords: acarbose; cyandin-3-rutinoside; synergism; α-glucosidase
Year: 2011 PMID: 21765605 PMCID: PMC3128364 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.10-116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Fig. 1The chemical structure of cyanidin-3-rutinoside (C3R).
The IC50 values for intestinal α-glucosidase (maltase and sucrase) by cyanidin-3-rutinoside and acarbose.
| Compounds | IC50 values (µM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Maltase | Sucrase | |
| Cyanidin-3-rutinoside | 2,323 ± 14.8 | 250.2 ± 8.1 |
| Acarbose | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 29.6 ± 3.5 |
Results are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 3.
Fig. 2Lineweaver-Burk plot for inhibitory activity of C3R on the intestinal sucrase.
Fig. 3The percentage enzyme inhibition of acarbose and its combination with C3R (1 µM) on (A) intestinal maltase, and (B) intestinal sucrase. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. *p<0.001 compared to acarbose alone.
Fig. 4The effects of C3R on plasma glucose concentration by oral (A) maltose and (B) sucrose tolerance test. Results are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 6. *p<0.05 compared with the control group.
Fig. 5The effects of C3R on the total areas under the curve (AUC) of plasma glucose concentration by oral (A) maltose, and (B) sucrose tolerance test. Results are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 6. *p<0.05 compared with the control group.
The combined effect of C3R and acarbose on plasma glucose concentration in oral maltose and sucrose tolerance test
| Groups | Plasma glucose (mg/dl) | AUC (mg/dl.min) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | 120 min | 180 min | ||
| Maltose loading | |||||||
| Control | 75.8 ± 6.7 | 163.7 ± 8.8 | 148.7 ± 5.4 | 132.4 ± 4.6 | 117.0 ± 6.5 | 96.1 ± 10.0 | 23,400.1 ± 660.6 |
| C3R (30 mg/kg) | 86.6 ± 9.7 | 145.6 ± 9.0 | 152.3 ± 12.5 | 138.0 ± 10.3 | 114.2 ± 12.8 | 100.9 ± 7.1 | 22,899.1 ± 1934.6 |
| Acarbose (3 mg/kg) | 80.1 ± 5.1 | 139.4 ± 6.5* | 120.8 ± 4.1* | 124.4 ± 7.3 | 109.2 ± 4.6 | 96.1 ± 12.2 | 20,920.7 ± 500.5* |
| C3R(30 mg/kg) + Acabose (3 mg/kg) | 84.0 ± 7.3 | 118.6 ± 5.6*,# | 119.1 ± 2.3* | 108.6 ± 4.7*,# | 107.2 ± 8.5 | 93.5 ± 7.6 | 17,859.1 ± 432.1*,# |
| Sucrose loading | |||||||
| Control | 85.1 ± 2.9 | 134.4 ± 7.8 | 159.3 ± 6.0 | 156.5 ± 11.0 | 120.4 ± 11.6 | 107.8 ± 7.3 | 23,413.6 ± 915.2 |
| C3R (30 mg/kg) | 90.5 ± 3.2 | 125.1 ± 7.0 | 148.3 ± 7.3 | 125.6 ± 7.1* | 116.0 ± 4.5 | 81.2 ± 10.3 | 21,459.2 ± 1,312.7 |
| Acarbose (3 mg/kg) | 85.6 ± 6.0 | 114.3 ± 3.5* | 125.1 ± 6.5* | 121.4 ± 9.0* | 101.2 ± 8.3 | 99.2 ± 5.3 | 19,325.4 ± 373.6* |
| C3R (30 mg/kg) + Acabose (3 mg/kg) | 94.0 ± 5.7 | 99.8 ± 4.1*,# | 109.7 ± 5.4*,# | 105.3 ± 5.6*,# | 95.3 ± 2.7 | 94.8 ± 6.8 | 17,786.3 ± 200.3*,# |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6 rats per group. *p<0.05 compared to control, #p<0.05 compared to acarbose.