OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) test among ambulatory HIV-infected persons. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: HIV-infected persons consecutively presenting to the HIV Clinic at Tembisa Main Clinic in Ekhuruleni, South Africa, were screened for symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) and asked to provide sputum and blood samples for smears for acid-fast bacilli and mycobacterial culture and a urine specimen for a LAM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Fine needle aspirates were obtained from participants with enlarged lymph nodes and sent for histopathology. Nonpregnant participants underwent chest x-ray. RESULTS: : Four hundred twenty-two HIV-infected participants were enrolled with median age 37 years (interquartile range: 31-44 years), median CD4+ T-cell count 215 cells per microliter (interquartile range: 107-347 cells/μL), and 212 (50%) receiving antiretroviral therapy. Thirty (7%) had active TB: 18 with only pulmonary TB, 5 with only extrapulmonary TB, and 7 with both pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB. Twenty-seven percent [95% confidence interval (CI): 12% to 48%] of TB cases were sputum acid-fast bacilli positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the urine LAM compared with the gold standard of positive bacteriology or histopathology were 32% (95% CI: 16% to 52%) and 98% (95% CI: 96% to 99%), respectively. Urine LAM had higher sensitivity in TB cases with higher bacillary burdens, though these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of urine LAM testing is inadequate to replace mycobacterial culture. In contrast to prior research on the urine LAM, this study was conducted among less sick, ambulatory HIV-infected patients presenting for routine care.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) test among ambulatory HIV-infected persons. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: HIV-infected persons consecutively presenting to the HIV Clinic at Tembisa Main Clinic in Ekhuruleni, South Africa, were screened for symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) and asked to provide sputum and blood samples for smears for acid-fast bacilli and mycobacterial culture and a urine specimen for a LAM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Fine needle aspirates were obtained from participants with enlarged lymph nodes and sent for histopathology. Nonpregnant participants underwent chest x-ray. RESULTS: : Four hundred twenty-two HIV-infected participants were enrolled with median age 37 years (interquartile range: 31-44 years), median CD4+ T-cell count 215 cells per microliter (interquartile range: 107-347 cells/μL), and 212 (50%) receiving antiretroviral therapy. Thirty (7%) had active TB: 18 with only pulmonary TB, 5 with only extrapulmonary TB, and 7 with both pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB. Twenty-seven percent [95% confidence interval (CI): 12% to 48%] of TB cases were sputum acid-fast bacilli positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the urine LAM compared with the gold standard of positive bacteriology or histopathology were 32% (95% CI: 16% to 52%) and 98% (95% CI: 96% to 99%), respectively. Urine LAM had higher sensitivity in TB cases with higher bacillary burdens, though these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of urine LAM testing is inadequate to replace mycobacterial culture. In contrast to prior research on the urine LAM, this study was conducted among less sick, ambulatory HIV-infected patients presenting for routine care.
Authors: Maunank Shah; Neil A Martinson; Richard E Chaisson; Desmond J Martin; Ebrahim Variava; Susan E Dorman Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Stephen D Lawn; Katharina Kranzer; David J Edwards; Matthew McNally; Linda-Gail Bekker; Robin Wood Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Keertan Dheda; Virginia Davids; Laura Lenders; Teri Roberts; Richard Meldau; Daphne Ling; Laurence Brunet; Richard van Zyl Smit; Jonathan Peter; Clare Green; Motasim Badri; Leonardo Sechi; Surendra Sharma; Michael Hoelscher; Rodney Dawson; Andrew Whitelaw; Jonathan Blackburn; Madhukar Pai; Alimuddin Zumla Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jonathan G Peter; Grant Theron; Richard van Zyl-Smit; Asheen Haripersad; Lynelle Mottay; Sarah Kraus; Anke Binder; Richard Meldau; Anneli Hardy; Keertan Dheda Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Stephanie Bjerrum; Ian Schiller; Nandini Dendukuri; Mikashmi Kohli; Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana; Alice A Zwerling; Claudia M Denkinger; Karen R Steingart; Maunank Shah Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Sylvia M LaCourse; Patricia B Pavlinac; Lisa M Cranmer; Irene N Njuguna; Cyrus Mugo; John Gatimu; Joshua Stern; Judd L Walson; Elizabeth Maleche-Obimbo; Julius Oyugi; Dalton Wamalwa; Grace John-Stewart Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Payam Nahid; Peter S Kim; Carlton A Evans; David Alland; Michael Barer; Jane Diefenbach; Jerrold Ellner; Richard Hafner; Carol Dukes Hamilton; Michael F Iademarco; Gregory Ireton; Michael E Kimerling; Christian Lienhardt; William R MacKenzie; Megan Murray; Mark D Perkins; Jamie E Posey; Teri Roberts; Christine Sizemore; Wendy S Stevens; Laura Via; Sharon D Williams; Wing W Yew; Susan Swindells Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 5.226